I feel Yang is pro business, particularly small business and his UBI would encourage more people to try their hand knowing there is a safety net if they are unsuccessful.
I agree with this:
If you are anti Business, than you are inversely socialist IMO.
But I disagree with the premise that Yang is anti-business.
To me, socialisms main objective is the redistribution of wealth (by force). It's important to highlight "by force" because so much of our past is about fighting for liberty and freedom. UBI is anti-freedom for many reasons.
The true cause of wealth gap is actually monetary policy .Most of what we hear from mainstream media is pure propaganda and a distraction from the true crime going on behind the scene. I will be creating some articles that will help people uncover the truth about how inflation is the number one cause of the wealth gap.
You just got a 1.5% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
Many of us are aware that cryptography and blockchain are here to stay, this is a reality and will not change. Adoption is real and is about to become one of the most disruptive events for humanity that has occurred in decades.
For this reason it is not surprising that political actors seek to gain advantages by handling the concepts of blockchain and encryption.
The fusion of politics with this technology was something to be expected. In fact, it would be beneficial for cryptography, because it would be giving it the necessary projection, since every citizen of the world should have access to cryptography, so with the impulse that politics can give it, perhaps we would be closer to this milestone.
Hmm very interesting, too bad hes a socialist though
I don't see him or his policies as socialist. He isn't anti business, just trying to make sure people don't get left behind.
Posted using Partiko Android
If you are anti Business, than you are inversely socialist IMO.
I feel Yang is pro business, particularly small business and his UBI would encourage more people to try their hand knowing there is a safety net if they are unsuccessful.
I agree with this:
But I disagree with the premise that Yang is anti-business.
To me, socialisms main objective is the redistribution of wealth (by force). It's important to highlight "by force" because so much of our past is about fighting for liberty and freedom. UBI is anti-freedom for many reasons.
The true cause of wealth gap is actually monetary policy .Most of what we hear from mainstream media is pure propaganda and a distraction from the true crime going on behind the scene. I will be creating some articles that will help people uncover the truth about how inflation is the number one cause of the wealth gap.
I'll keep an eye out for your upcoming articles, sounds interesting. Thanks for sharing your input.
Posted using Partiko Android
Shared to twitter
#posh
Hi, @jk6276!
You just got a 1.5% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
Regards @jk6276.
Many of us are aware that cryptography and blockchain are here to stay, this is a reality and will not change. Adoption is real and is about to become one of the most disruptive events for humanity that has occurred in decades.
For this reason it is not surprising that political actors seek to gain advantages by handling the concepts of blockchain and encryption.
The fusion of politics with this technology was something to be expected. In fact, it would be beneficial for cryptography, because it would be giving it the necessary projection, since every citizen of the world should have access to cryptography, so with the impulse that politics can give it, perhaps we would be closer to this milestone.
All best, Piotr