Sort:  

I agree. That possible 'smoking gun' information is so overt and blatant that in my opinion, I think it's been purposefully planted by a pretty paid shill and/or bot to discredit the research people are putting together. We have to maintain the itegrity of the people's investigative research and as such stick to verifiable information that can be tracked to good sources with hyper links provided. Alternatively we need to make sure that any commentary and/or speculation is clearly stated as such rather then being presented as fact. I'm reminding myself about this too as I write this.