You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Podesta's Artist - stuff so bad journalists don't show it in articles
The thing about his "favorite" Patricia "Puke" is that her work features demons as well as the implication of pedophilia. So it's a step worse than all the other art he likes. It combines the evil/satanic + the human pedo evil.
I guess it's a matter of opinion. In Piccinini's work the pedophilia is implicit as for Noble's art it's explicit. Google ''Kim Noble art'' images and see the results, it's right in our face. I don't even want to describe what we see, let alone post it here.
Kim Noble's art was the first I ever looked at. Then the Serbian artist's. I saw almost everything Noble produced. It's evil.
Noble's is explicit pedophelia + Sadomasochism.
Piccinini's is implicit pedophilia + Demons (satanism)