RE: The discovery of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter - part 4
Thank you, @mage00000, for these remarkable insights into Tesla's thinking.
While I personally always struggle to understand the underlying scientific ideas, and to compare what you're presenting with present-day "conventional theory" about electricity, I am always keenly on the lookout for possible practical applications of the ideas.
If electricity is not the ether itself, but rather a fluid gas, what contains it as it travels along a wire? Why does it simply not expand out in every direction from that wire?
Is the notion of "positive" and "negative" nothing more than the immediate direction of flow of this fluid/gas?
I'm fascinated by your experiments showing the connection with temperature, and would love to try replicating them with a small Tesla coil that I have.
Thank you very much for your continuing work here on Steemit. I have been re-steeming your series on my own blog in the hope of gaining you a wider readership.
😄😇😄
Anyone who says he doesn't struggle understanding the underlying processes is either lying or he hasn't got a clue of what he is talking about. What Tesla sees as the difference between positive and negative, I really don't know, but I know (as it is confirmed in my experiments) that it is not the pressure of the gas.
The IR-thermometer experiment is very easy to replicate. Please do, so you'll get more into the Tesla-sphere.
I saw you were re-steeming and as a thank-you I am up-voting your comments. :)
I really do appreciate your presence here and the good articles you're sharing.
Unfortunately, the struggles of life keep me from "playing" with Tesla and other fascinating technologies nearly as much as I would like. Maybe when my "Steem-Ship" comes in, I'll have more time! ;)
Steem on, my friend, and thanks for your encouraging articles and interaction! :D
Forgot to say: in today's post we'll look at a practical application.