You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Part #4: Šunik Water Grove / Šunik-Wasserhain
thats true enough but at least now you have it in your kit if you ever need that longer reach :)
thats true enough but at least now you have it in your kit if you ever need that longer reach :)
Yes, but I think, in future I will try to leave the other lenses at home, when I go for wildlife shots.
But what if I see a beautiful beetle or butterfly, and my macro lens is at home 😧
Thats always the issue, I pick one or maybe two lenses to carry into the city to not carry to much but if I do trips in the car i take most of them LOL
Last weekend my wife couldn't even lift my backpack, and I only needed the Sigma telephoto and the macro lens.
We both take too much with us, just in case we might need something 😁
Posted using Partiko Android
Most days I take the 24-240 and one of the smaller lens into the city the 24-240 and macro does make the bag fairly heavy witrh the other things I carry for work LOL
That's it, I have the 70-200 and the 24-105 always with me, and most of the times the 16-35 too. With the macro the backpack would be completely full ... and the only lens I might need during a working day would be the 24-105 😀
Posted using Partiko Android
I used to carry a lot a few years back but now I am feeling my age a little so I am sensible and do not carry to much
This is, why I have to rethink and take only the gear with me, which I will actually need. The backpack last weekend was too heavy to carry it on the motorbike, and I can still feel the weight in my back.
Yeah but I am sure that for you like me when you do take less you always have in the back of your mind that that I should take one more lens just incase....