You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Invitation of the Ancients (Nik9)
Seriously? for an artistic nude from 1926? NSFW for who? I am genuinely confused and see nothing offensive nor riske in an artistic representations of the human form that is neither erotic much less pornographic. Besides - surely, as the thumbnail most likely shows up in the preview and it is imagined as somehow vulgar - don't open it if you're at work! But this is ART!
Perhaps, but if nudes pop up on screens and more importantly firewalls at work they get people in trouble, no matter how artistic or tasteful they may be deemed to be...
That is why nsfw stands for Not Safe For Work and we have automatic filters for them.
the nipples are black :D it's ok an she's not nude shes covered by a layer of air, although i was going to say the same thing, Wouldn't call it NSFW since there isnt any nudity past the thumbnail , although it draws you in :)
AAAND case and point why isn't this nsfw? are we robots :D new music videos and all case and point , should we go in the way of the mainstream and just get the endless Trap and w/e so much electro I can't even count , or is this a platform for thinking people :D
Thanks for your explanation, though I must confess, I find it hard to subscribe to such a police state of mind - most particularly in a peer to peer paradigm where hierarchical judgement of what is considered "naughty" and to be "censored" has questionable authority - at the very least for this user - this one prefers to abide by his own sense of decorum. There is nothing genuinely offensive here.