I truly enjoy your oposition, because i have read your statement over two or three times and i come to the same conclusion, as you said ( tp govern mentally) nasa is just a government organization put in place to drain tax payer money. And i have used my own experience and senses that show me whats real, and since you extensively went thru my links as i asked i will answer your questions, i am at work at the moment give me some time to get home and find them in our comments ^^ and if you read correctly the court gave robothem his money back because it was not conclusive that the water was bent at all ^^bur seriously, the Bedford level was never debunked and robothem was rewarded his money back so wallace never debunked anything
Please read the story of the Old Bedford Level experiment properly.
You are cherry picking and overlooking the fact that Samuel Rowbotham's experiment was successfully debunked by Alfred Wallace and again by Henry Oldham in 1901.
If you read the story correctly, you'll see that the court did NOT award the money to be returned due to the results of the experiment at all (to John Hampden by the way).
The court ruled that the wager had been invalid because Hampden retracted the bet.
Alfred Wallace's demonstration actually showed a curvature consistent with a spherical Earth.
The most worrying part of the story is that when rational though failed, Hampden resulted to making death threats towards Wallace.
“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan
And i know man, i was showing you the oposing side to show you that ,thru my own eyes and experience, i see that ALL math and scientific "findings" were all theories and conjecture, not a single test has ever proven the sphere, EVER.
So, are you just going to continue to ignore the facts, because they do not accommodate your beliefs? That's not being very clever.
Real science does not claim to 'prove' anything. Science either supports a theory or disproves it.
For one, sticking with the single story that you brought up, Alfred Wallace's demonstration actually supports the findings that there is a curvature consistent with a spherical Earth. He also disproved Rowbotham's findings by showing that Rowbotham's experiment was flawed.
I truly enjoy your oposition, because i have read your statement over two or three times and i come to the same conclusion, as you said ( tp govern mentally) nasa is just a government organization put in place to drain tax payer money. And i have used my own experience and senses that show me whats real, and since you extensively went thru my links as i asked i will answer your questions, i am at work at the moment give me some time to get home and find them in our comments ^^ and if you read correctly the court gave robothem his money back because it was not conclusive that the water was bent at all ^^bur seriously, the Bedford level was never debunked and robothem was rewarded his money back so wallace never debunked anything
Please read the story of the Old Bedford Level experiment properly.
You are cherry picking and overlooking the fact that Samuel Rowbotham's experiment was successfully debunked by Alfred Wallace and again by Henry Oldham in 1901.
If you read the story correctly, you'll see that the court did NOT award the money to be returned due to the results of the experiment at all (to John Hampden by the way).
The court ruled that the wager had been invalid because Hampden retracted the bet.
Alfred Wallace's demonstration actually showed a curvature consistent with a spherical Earth.
The most worrying part of the story is that when rational though failed, Hampden resulted to making death threats towards Wallace.
“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan
And i know man, i was showing you the oposing side to show you that ,thru my own eyes and experience, i see that ALL math and scientific "findings" were all theories and conjecture, not a single test has ever proven the sphere, EVER.
So, are you just going to continue to ignore the facts, because they do not accommodate your beliefs? That's not being very clever.
Real science does not claim to 'prove' anything. Science either supports a theory or disproves it.
For one, sticking with the single story that you brought up, Alfred Wallace's demonstration actually supports the findings that there is a curvature consistent with a spherical Earth. He also disproved Rowbotham's findings by showing that Rowbotham's experiment was flawed.
And i found your twp questions, as bias as they are, i will answer them. And i truly appreciate the upvotes.