It's in the terms of use. Which does kind of make sense. Why sell it on their site if you can get it anywhere? That's why I don't put my "good" photos on their though. Otherwise I wouldn't be able to license them myself.
Ok. Interesting. I thought it might be an option. I have some photos up on Getty via EyeEm market and they are not exclusive. That said EyeEm then take a cut.
Wow its quite harsh on similars "All Content submitted to Getty Images is on a Content exclusive basis. This means that Content submitted to Getty Images and any other content that is substantially the same (a “Similar”) may not be licensed to any third party unless Getty Images has notified you that Content and all of its Similars have been rejected"
Yeah it is a bit. But with the time I spend on Getty, I don't have time to do the same work with similars on other sites. Like sharing to lots of social media
It's in the terms of use. Which does kind of make sense. Why sell it on their site if you can get it anywhere? That's why I don't put my "good" photos on their though. Otherwise I wouldn't be able to license them myself.
Ok. Interesting. I thought it might be an option. I have some photos up on Getty via EyeEm market and they are not exclusive. That said EyeEm then take a cut.
Wow its quite harsh on similars "All Content submitted to Getty Images is on a Content exclusive basis. This means that Content submitted to Getty Images and any other content that is substantially the same (a “Similar”) may not be licensed to any third party unless Getty Images has notified you that Content and all of its Similars have been rejected"
Yeah it is a bit. But with the time I spend on Getty, I don't have time to do the same work with similars on other sites. Like sharing to lots of social media
Yes for sure. So hard getting the balance right.