RE: The Guardian Massif and Fires in Tasmania
Did you look at any of those 12k shots in the link I provided? There are lots of shots like this https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/21650104195/
The astronauts received extensive training on their use and took the cameras home to practice ; so to say they are not trained photographers is simply not true. Anyone that has used a medium format film camera with a rangefinder would know they are very sharp for anything beyond the focal plane especially for the 70mm wide angle lenses they used (which is 36mm lens equivalent on 35mm terms). All you do is dial in the distance and exposure settings and aim the box. It's not rocket science; this is how a modern go pro works with a fixed focal point and no focusing and why you can get good pictures with one just strapping it to your helmet or chest. The framing of most of the photos is terrible as you can see in the gallery and they just crop them for presentation on official sites.
On the moon there is no atmosphere to suspend dust so dust is simply not a problem and they used contained cartridges for the film which they could simply put in the rover and then the lander. 30k shots were over all the missions and each film magazine had 360 photos (160 color and 200 black and white pictures ). So that is only ~80 magazines over 9 lunar missions so 8-10 magazines per mission. This is hardly a lot; the magazines look about 10cm by 10cm. http://www.ninfinger.org/karld/My%20Space%20Museum/apollocams.htm . They managed to bring a golf club; storing 8 cartridges of film is nothing.
Regardless film issues aside how one can throw away all the other evidence (radio frequency, photos from non US space agencies, Russian verification, laser ranging testing, moon rocks, etc) based on a belief that someone could not train an astronaut to shoot some photos with gloves on or store 8 film film cartridges.
The probability of the 400k people working on apollo keeping a conspiracy for 5 decades along with all the international agencies and universities from other countries cooperating to make up new data over the those decades to maintain the false sense of consistency in the data is mindbogglingly low. Anyway I really am done now ;-)
No I did not look at the photos. I am already convinced this is fake. I looked at it several years ago and have innumerable reasons you would then research to keep the con going in your mind.
399900 people worked in compartmentalized jobs and did not see the whole picture.
10 or so were evil and in on it.
90 were being blackmailed with sex tapes or whatever.
Just let me see your shots from the camera strapped to your chest with the motorcycle helmet and gloves. Try to get to somewhere below zero at least and change film 20 or 30 times in a few hours. When those come out good I will know you are right. Or maybe find a friend and train them for a few hours. Anyone can take a good photo.
With 360 photos in a magazine there was only 8-10 film magazines over a whole Apollo mission. Not 20-30 times an hour. You keep simply misquoting facts. There is ample evidence outside of information provided by NASA and the US. I have spent a good part of my life as a photographer (have been published by National Geographic) so I think I am aware of what it takes to take photos of the quality on the moon missions, which contrary to belief are are not particularly high quality from a framing/exposure/focus perspective.
If you wont even look at the evidence then there is no point taking the time to discuss.