Yin Yang Pairs and the Balance of Nature

in philosophy •  2 months ago

Yin Yang Pairs

In my recent life I have been trying to find both the Yin and Yang of a concept before overlaying an opinion on that concept. It should be noted that for a single concept, a "true Yin/Yang" is not entirely possible, as each concept could have a fractaling hierarchy of Yin/Yang pairs. It can be up to the perceiver to decide which Yin/Yang pair is most relevant to their worldview. I'd like to examine the Yin/Yang pairs of Philosophy.

From the outside perspective, and without further inspection, Philosophy appears to be one of the more unproductive forms of human time. People see Philosophy as a Socratic circle of people thinking complex thoughts about abstract things that have no relation to real life productivity, or usefulness. This is one side to the balance that nature prescribes, a balance that can sometimes appear contradictory. Upon first glance Philosophy seems to be an unproductive facet; it yields no material, and the content isn't exactly fun for most, so why sacrifice time for Philosophy?

The other side to the balance reveals itself only after pursuing Philosophy. Once a study is found that resonates with the perceiver, that philosophical lesson stays with the perceiver in all relevant scenarios. Life obstacles are presented in a different perspective, one that allows for a sort of forgiveness and agreement with the obstacle. All matters of life are changed with the discovery of a resonant Philosophy. Therefore philosophical lessons augment and even enhance productive pursuits, making Philosophy a worthy addition to any long-term time preference schedule.

This is only one possible Yin/Yang pair to Philosophy; a cove of hidden treasure that appears barren on first sight; but this is (once again) as nature requires.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!