lols! Philosophers raise fundamental questions and open the readers to more possibilities. What 'we' wont do is to tell you this is an answer to anything! In philosophy, every issue is an 'open ending' one. Meaning there is another flaws in it that another observer will see. This is why thesis gets anti-thesis and anti-thesis gets synthesis. In the end, this synthesis also becomes another thesis because someone somewhere will open it to possibilities. This will in turn give birth to another anti-thesis and possibly in ad-infinitum.

The point is, we do not appreciate dogmatism. So we always want people to explore and reflect on things. So i am not saying i am right with my writeup above. The writeup is nothing but a possibility - it has flaws which readers need to point out.

Thanks for your time brother!