I apologize, I was on vacation.

"Wasn't the KKK founded or tied in with Free Masons or other secret societies?"
Yes, but this has nothing to do with Christianity. In fact, the idea of religion as we know it is manmade. I believe it was a tool of the devil to separate people from God. Boy is it working.

"I'm not positive on this but I swear I read that somewhere before.."
Indeed.

"So I mean.. Also.. If you look back to the whole gospels, God's Spells.. It was around this time that it is believed white people started really gaining power."
Actually, the Bible isn't about white people. Also, simply manipulating words phonetically to make correlation is a fallacy. You tend to do that, it seems.

"There's some information that I came across that suggests the first white pharaoh was named Christus."
Abject falsity. Christus was another name for the Egyptian god, Serapis. Simply put, Serapis (Sarapis, Zaparrus) was an invented god. He was a composite of several Egyptian and Hellenistic deities who was introduced to the world at the beginning of the Ptolemaic (Greek) Period in Egypt during the reign of Ptolemy I.
Ptolemy I became the first European pharaoh of Egypt through military force led by Alexander the Greek (a.k.a Alexander the Great). When Ptolemy became pharaoh of Egypt, he wanted the Egyptians to consecrate him as a god. He wanted to be called a god because that was the title all of the pharaohs of Egypt were called prior to him. However, the people of Egypt refused to call him a god because they knew the only reason he became a pharaoh was through force, so in “305 BC -Ptolemy took the title of Pharaoh, taking the Egyptian name Meryamun Setepenre, which means “Beloved of Amun (Amun means God) Chosen of Ra (Ra means God)”, and because of the Egyptians refusal to acknowledge him as a God, he began killing the people of Egypt, which caused the Egyptian priests at Memphis to give into his request by agreeing to consecrate him to priesthood, in order to save their own lives.
Thus, Serapis (Christus) was meant to form a bridge between the Greek and Egyptian religion in a new age in which their respective gods were brought face to face with each other, so that both Egyptians and Greeks could find union in a specific supreme entity.
Chrestus may be translated as "Messiah", though the term need not apply to any specific Messiah, such as Jesus. how great confusion between Serapis and Christ could have existed is really somewhat questionable. In 68 AD, a mob of pagans is said to have formed at the Serapis Temple in Alexandria, who then descended on the Christians who were celebrating Easter at Baucalis.
A correspondence of Emperor Hadrian refers to Alexandrian worshippers of Serapis calling themselves Bishops of Christ:

'Egypt, which you commended to me, my dearest Servianus, I have found to be wholly fickle and inconsistent, and continually wafted about by every breath of fame. The worshipers of Serapis (here) are called Christians, and those who are devoted to the god Serapis (I find), call themselves Bishops of Christ.'
It therefore could have simply been applied to "Lord Serapis", so that in fact, there was never any connection at all between the early Christians and the worshippers of Serapis.

"It might have been around this time they really started changing things to umm.. FAVOR.. White men.
Cause after the "bi-bull" (bible) we start seeing much less tolerance for women and minorities."
First of all, and another point to the previous rebut, to think that all this occured between "white" people is foolishness. Ptolemy was macedonian greek, with olive skin. Have we "americanized" images of these people to make it seem they are white? Absolutely, but again, learm more about the subject. Phonetics again, ugh. And, actually, the reason why there were laws spoken of regarding how to treat women and slaves is because they needed to be devoloped in order to progress the treatment of them. Certainly people with power will corrupt, and this is equivocally so for any time period. How do you stop someone from doing something when it is already made a practice? Appeal to conscience. Logic draws the conclusion that prior to this time, slaves and women wre treated worse. C'mon, the pyramids couldn't be easy work.

"It's not surprising at all when you really think about it, that.. the KKK and Church basically mean the same fucking thing."
The derivitave words mean "circle". OOOoooo, aaaaahhhh. End of associative factors.

"NEXT is.. The "Arc of the covenant"..
The ARK of the Covenant was more like a chest, which is derived from arca, which is translated from "'arown" strong's #0727 which is the word used in the Bible... Again, more study is needed.
I was curious about this so I was like.. What's arc?
Basically it's a physical movement, BUT.. Also, it means ARCH. Sorta like "Archers" are "BOWMEN" BOW=ARCH same thing.
Bowing and arching is showing umm.. Loyalty to royalty or those in power."
They didn't bow to it, they bowed before it in worship of God. You arguing to this end is showing the grasping, albeit futile, nature of your post.
The last part makes me further amused of your muse, if that's what you called this.

Oh, and that's not including the other historical accounts of Jesus. Josephus, et al.

Want to talk beliefs? You have shared some of yours, and you've convinced yourself of them, regardless of whether or not there are additional facts that you have not taken into account. There are others, in more mainstream postulations, who have done the same, and I'm sure you believe some of their conclusions, even though they have publicly declared that there are facts that are unknown. Most things that are in the world are there to derive income. Some are even promised income to present some lies as truth, and the flocks stampede to adopt it, unwittingly. Don't contribute to the levity.