You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Wikipedia, the truth and the ...eye of Kennedy
That's wild, didn't realize wikipedia functioned like that. I've always taken their info with a grain of salt. Now I have a legitimate reason too.
So basically they are saying, make your content/info popular enough so we can post it.
I'm not saying everything in wikipedia is sketchy (not, by far), but the protocol is "weird" to say the least. Based on what they did for a simple coin that is already photographed and documented, you can imagine what goes on for more complex or controversial issues.
Agreed - it is still a good a source for alot of information.