Straight up and to the point. Within the first two paragraphs, I can say with certainty that this author has a skewed and personally biased idea about the nature of God. Secondly he argues that "By becoming a totalitarian destructive order and by depriving man of the possibility of realizing his creative potentials in everyday life and in a humane way, capitalism produced the most atrocious crimes." Now, since it is a matter of historicle fact that Stalin and Pol Pot are responsible for more atrotious crimes than all the western leaders and/or religious factions combined, he must mean the most atrotious crimes would be the the deprivation of creativity. If so, I would have to ask where he comes to this conclusion? Western culture and captitalism specifically has produce more invention and technological breakthroughs in the past hundred years than all of human history. It is the promise of profiting from one's labor that adds extra incentive to put your all into it.

If I'm missing something then please explain. Because in two paragraphs he has written many questionable statements in absolute terms. My questions for you personally are 1 who is this author, and where did study to come to these conclusions. And 2 why should I trust what he has to say when he consistently writes subjective ideas in absolute terms? So far this is not philosophy, it's propaganda.