I'm all for rules and structure, as long as the workings behind them are transparent.
There's a pretty strong argument for the view that we need structure in order to be free - the road and the car are the most obvious examples. A football match another.
Without roads (and the rest of the automobile infrastructure) no one can drive anywhere, without rules in a football match (which OK some will try to flex) there is no possibility to display skills, it just becomes a thug's match.
Rules and structure give us more freedom and create more opportunities for us to maximise our individual potentials - having a no-rules 'do what you like' radical freedom approach is a sub-optimal IMHO.
However, It's hard work chipping in to maintain standards, and draining, many a collective has fallen apart because of 'meetingitise (too many meetings) - so striking the balance is not easy!
If the end result is have more of this sort of post in my feed rather than the dross I still see on Steemit, gimme rules.
Cheers!
I think transparency is important. Not all of our community guidelines translate from operating on a somewhat restrictive service like Discord to a blockchain, but we're working on figuring out what makes sense and getting an updated guideline on what will and won't be acceptable and we'll most likely pin it in the hamburger menu at the top right with our other links.
That would be good - having it pinned and prominent!
Posted using Partiko Android