You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: "Our Corrupt Sense of Fairness" or Steemit's Incessant Rule Changes?
While I don't like constant rule changes, I do think that they have been a necessary groping towards what is workable and sustainable (and perfectly understandable for a platform still in beta).
And, agreeing with @innuendo, it probably took centuries for the rules of chess to become fixed and standardized (and chess is a MUCH simpler game than steemit).
I wonder if they were changing the rules every 2-4 weeks initially and doing so without notifying everyone that played? Mid-game someone moves their queen diagonally across the board and captures a piece on the other side of the table.
The opponent is like, "What the fucketh? Thou cannot moveth thy Queen sucheth!?"
In reply, the creator of chess says ... "Dost thou not read ChessHub? I made this change in rules a fortnight ago!"
;)
Bringeth me my Fool! I tire of cold logic!
stop being a sophist just because you are vested, please
Haha I sweareth thou is a jester fit for the Lords court:D
This comment made me laugh so hard. Thy hath done well, good sir.
It's proven that most things in life "ain't fair" and when you add rules out of spite, they usually are not ratified properly. There for making another rule that's being circumvented,or understood better then others. Making that problem of " things ain't fair ".. Again.
whats that? .. another rule that's being changed, and the problem goes on.
Wonderful point Tuck, immaculate
Come on Sir, I expect a little more intellectual honesty from you,
he has a point.
It's seems that everyone agrees changes, especially this early on are fine and likely even beneficial, yet they MUST be made transparently with proper notice to all involved.
This is obvious logic and anything else is quite dishonorable.