You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is "Pro-Life" an Accurate Label?

in #philosophy8 years ago

Or perhaps it is, but many of us are ignorant to what is currently understood (myself included). The chemicals, emotions, and bonds created at the time of birth have been studied and explored. Ultimately, it's all chemicals, though our subjective experience of those chemicals my vary widely.

Sort:  

Science is a process. The moment we say "it has been explored" as though said exploration is somehow known beyond a shadow of a doubt to be complete, is a dangerous one. It is the unknown that drives all science. Once we say, "Oh we know everything" about this or that, we are right back to religion and the flat earth.

Good science doesn't do that though. Good science simply says here's what we know now and why we think we know it. Good science openly seeks correction.

Good science doesn't do that though. Good science simply says here's what we know now and why we think we know it. Good science openly seeks correction.

Exactly. That is all I am saying.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 60171.52
ETH 2421.68
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.46