You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Making a Case for Reason Over Outrage
This is why philosophy is such a wonderful tool. Logic replaces emotion, which helps us look at issues objectively. Yet we are only human, and people have a tendency to let their emotions (or other peoples' emotions) get the best of them.
You also make an interesting point about honesty in politics. I definitely agree that we shouldn't hide our opinion, or necessarily punish those who voice their own truth. This is also assuming that political leaders are open to discussing their inner most thoughts in public (without flipping on issues).
Thanks for the post, I enjoyed it!
I am glad to hear that you enjoyed reading through this post @jrhhewett. :c)
I quite agree. Even the best-intentioned of individuals can be rendered susceptible to emotional compromise when matters hit very close to home. I also like your reference to "other peoples' emotions" - as yes, outrage (real or contrived) can be infectious.
It is my view that persons should not be punished for expressing their views - even if elements of those views might immediately seem reprehensible or otherwise disturbing. At the very least there is value in such views now residing 'above the table'. Such views can be addressed - their logic or lack thereof can be picked apart - and superior views can be posed against them.
I would even suggest that flipping on issues, whether one be a politician or not, need not be considered a negative thing provided that there is a clear crumb trail that can be followed to outline the evolution of perspective (beyond populist motives).
Such provides hope for a cleaner kind of politics - like opening the windows in a house to let the stagnant air flow. :c)
Thank you again for your very thoughtful comment!