Why would most people never get rich?

Most people, as if it was not deceived and he was not deceived, will never be rich. The topic of money and financial success today is the number one issue.

However, this was the most important topic before, at all times, always, just covered it from different angles. Let's be honest: everyone wants to get rich or have enough money to live without thinking about them. To have a high-paying job or a profitable business, to wear beautiful, made of natural materials, not second-hand clothes, to live in a spacious house, not on a rented house or in a hostel, to travel twice a year to the warm sea... and not to work to exhaustion at an unloved job. However, the vast majority will forever remain disappointed dreamers, will continue to live from salary to salary, will remain mortgage-creditor slaves of their masters of the XXI century. Why?

Reason 1: the law of natural equilibrium As can not be in nature all equally beautiful or equally intelligent, and can not be all equally well-off and rich. Someone will always have more compared to whom you will be poorer. And even among millionaires there are their poor. In all countries of the world, without exception, capitalist or Communist or social orientation, the elite and the minority in power have access to most of the resources. Compared with 2-10% of the elite, 90% will always have less resources and material benefits and, accordingly, be considered, or consider themselves, little or less well - off.

Reason 2: the problem of the majority should make me rich is that it expects someone to do something for it and for it. The state should provide higher wages, the husband should earn more, parents should give higher education and to arrange a high-paying job. The majority finds the reasons of the poverty in a difficult economic situation, in continuous, "popular" crises, in the bad power, insufficient communications, not that education, injustice of the bad world in relation to them, good. And it is extremely rare to sincerely try to identify the reasons for themselves, to change something and to act.

Reason 3: the inability to manage money many of us already have capital. These are some savings, the same wages, benefits and inheritance. Many of us have long been able if not to get rich, it can provide a fairly modest but comfortable life for the next few years, if elementary learned how to manage money. Most of the rich people became rich not just because they took and earned a lot of money, but because they knew how to properly dispose of the money, multiply and save.
All of us had and there are acquaintances who and with considerable earnings always in debts as in silks. And those who at modest life manages to gather up on the apartment or the car, for example.

Reason 4: the modern caste system we Have, of course, there is no division into castes, as it is still in small-town India, but also here to break out of the poor lower classes above — to the more affluent the top, from the workers and peasants in the top managers and the modern aristocrats to the common man extremely difficult. Simply because the elite is closed to strangers and protects itself and the capital. And it is still important for us, as in pre-revolutionary Russia, to be born in the right place, in the right clan, in the right social layer and circle. The birth will provide, or will provide, a further lease of life, the entrance in the desired closed doors. Those who are born lower caste, followed by fierce competition, starting with the school, then the Institute — if you get to do, the division into "their own and others", the struggle in the workplace for the "crust of bread", etc.

Reason 5: the problem of understanding security and poverty Is a good saying: not someone who has a lot of money, but someone who has enough. That is, you can consider yourself secured (rich), having a thousand conventional units, and can be considered a beggar, having a hundred thousand. You can enjoy scholarships, and it is possible to grieve the salary of an engineer of the fifth year. Often it is enough to change only the sphere of activity or the employer. For example, an engineer from a loss-making plant to get the same engineer in Gazprom. Or a teacher with knowledge of the language — in a foreign company, with the same knowledge. The reasons why the majority today, as before, will never come out of the vicious circle of insufficient material security will still be the same expectation that someone should come and give, a small probability and even more misunderstanding (as well as unwillingness), why break out of the area with small capital and break through to where other money rotates, a stereotypical understanding of wealth and poverty.

Like my post? ---VOTE--- @ivser ---RESTEEM--- Thank you!