You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Are You Not Entertained? Physical vs. Intellectual Conflict

in #philosophy7 years ago

I think this is a great article and I think we should look at the word "consenting" for a moment. Do the 2 people who have agreed to beat each other senseless really know what they have consented to? Have they been educated to know what they are actually doing? Do they each possibly have such deep self-loathing in their unquestioned histories that they would agree to hurt their physical temples for worldly power and prestige and to make fiat currency - a ponzi scheme perpetrated upon the masses by a small collection of psychopaths who have been "allowed" to do so. If we had a gift economy do you think people would still consent to this kind of activity? ... No I would say we are "involving" (involution as opposed to evolution) and even more likely DEVOLVING...

Sort:  

I don't think the evidence supports that claim. Read some Steven Pinker or Matt Ridley. We are certainly moving forward based on the data they show. The concept of consent would have been completely laughed at not that long ago with the divine right of kings and all that. Today we talk about it as if it's a given.

thank you for the suggestion, I will check it out.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 67724.53
ETH 2606.51
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.72