The human body: We're just elemental chaos. Yet, somehow we're conscious.

in #philosophy6 years ago

Last night, I watched a documentary about chaos. It spoke a lot of about systems "self-organising", referencing the work of Alan Turing, and the formula he used to determine the stripes on a zebra, and patterns on cows.


Image via PublicDomainImages / pixabay

The one thing that struck me while watching the documentary is something that I've always thought about, but never considered or researched very heavily. What are the atomic, elemental building blocks of the human body? We of course know that most of the human body is water, but it's more interesting to look at it an atomic level. To me, at least:

The human body consists of:

Elemental% of total body weight
Oxygen65
Carbon18.5
Hydrogen9.5
Nitrogen3.2
Calcium1.5
Phosphorus1
Potassium0.4
Sodium0.2
Chlorine0.2
Magnesium0.1
Sulfur0.04
Others0.36

Data in table adapted from Ask A Biologist.

How then, does consciousness manage to manifest itself from these assorted atomic masses? If I were to go to the oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen shops, purchase some, and add dashes of the other essential atomic elements for human life, why can't I put it in a mixing bowl, and voila, new human?


Image via qimono / pixabay

No doubt it could be possible, if you were able to chain each and every atom in the exact sequence we find it in the human body; but what would that person be like? Would they be like the one that we copied? Is it even possible to "copy" things on an atomic level.

Yes, we have genetic engineering, in order to introduce the most favorable traits into crops, animals, or even human embryos, but how far away are we from atomic engineering? By that, I mean very unscientifically, the engineering of atoms, into systems that mimic those of the human body.

I've recently been re-exploring the work of Jean Baudrillard, a French philosopher and continue to be intrigued by his work Simulacra and Simulations and wonder what an engineered human might be like. We have such a precious view of consciousness; yet sub-atomically, the random dance of electrons point to either a a completely chaotic universe, or a deterministic one.

The concept of free will and the general order of things that we classify and comprehend is not the concerns of atoms, sub-atomic particles, and the universe.

I'm not a religious individual. I try to understand the world around me with an interpretation of physics, chemistry, biology, and a large dose of nihilism, yet I remain rapt with wonder at the fact that plentiful, elemental particles that make up the world, make us up too.

To bring in Carl Sagan with some closing remarks: "The nitrogen in our DNA, the calcium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the carbon in our apple pies were made in the interiors of collapsing stars. We are made of starstuff."

Sort:  

Yes chaos is amazing :) The chaos theory was discovered by a weather man.... Trying to predict the weather... They discovered that if you change a number even a bit, like on 5th decimal ...in the long run you get completly difrent result. So predicting the weather long term is imposible, and from here was the term butterfly efect as well :)... the small change symbolising butterfly, and in long term it can make huragan.

While reading your article, I was reminded of another I read, not so long ago. It was from Science Daily and the point of that article was that if mankind has freewill, he must get it from matter. Apparently, the scientists who did the math couldn't find another source for freewill.

Just a couple months ago, I read another article describing how scientists are starting to think that everything is conscious. It went into some detail but it suggested that a chair or a rock is conscious, but it's a very simple consciousness.

Then I think of the proton, with an apparent half life of 1035 years. That's an extremely stable particle, and if he (or she) is conscious, that is a very, very long time to think.

Then there is my friend, a computer programmer and infrared laser mad scientist. He once said that the voices we hear in our heads is the sound of the mitochondria talking as one.

Wherever "freewill" comes from, it's a trip.

It feels like freewill is a veneer in some research. To me, if it exists or doesn't seems like the most likely question to the meaning of life.

If it does exist: great.
If it doesn't exist: why and how did we come to such a conclusion?

i believe the deeper we go with the brain research the more answers we will get in the close future.
im also curios to see if we will make a computer with conscious in hour life time! its probably inevitable but i wonder when will that happen....
thanks for the post!

Simulating consciousness will be easy... once we have enough power. How it will act, behave, learn is what will fascinate me. Thanks for dropping by!

If you're looking for a new rabbit-hole, you've come to the right place.
Information doesn't exist in any material sense.
Weigh your hard drive, format it, and weigh it again.
Despite removing a heap of information, it weighs the same.
Sign a sentence to a deaf guy who emails it to his mum, who yells it to her neighbour through a megaphone.
Nothing undertook the whole journey except the sentence itself.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.13
JST 0.032
BTC 61383.17
ETH 2915.78
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.61