You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The rebellious man of Albert Camus

in #philosophy7 years ago

In a very difficult topic you are thinking. I'm not sure whether we should limit Plato to such a type of teaching. Plato's political reasoning seems to me to be something that is not serious, his value is elsewhere. Irrationalism and Intuition of Incoming Christianity, Idealism. Removing the rational for me also has a positive side that is mystical and gives a claim that it is more than life. The rational enslave, cripples the imagination, and makes the person poorer. If you read "Candide" by Voltaire and the final of this work, when he comes to calmly and deny the imagination, this is for me an aristotelian ending. Yes, if we see the irrational from its political point of view, then it is pure evil, it only generates totalitarian regimes and deprives individuality.

Thank you for the comment. :)

Sort:  

I agree, it all comes down to balance. I actually liked Plato's early work. I think he was representing Socrates very well. His later work is where I diverge. I was coming from a strictly political direction on that. Imagination is the engine of creation and progress. Thank you for posting thought provoking content! 👍👍👍

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 78880.92
ETH 3188.85
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.68