I hold the answer - God is the one unbegotten. God was never "created" because God has always existed. That which is infinite has no beginning or end, for it always has been. Our Father, and Heaven, are not subject to "time" time does not apply to that which is infinite or immortal. So when you die, you enter a realm where you do not age, where "time" does not apply. That is the truth. Our God is not the God of the dead but of the living and those that believe in me will never die.
In western philosophy "God" and his/her/it's creation are separated entities. (Causeless) existence is one of "Gods" properties (as it is a necessary property of perfection, which is by definition THE property of what we call "God"). For many western philosophers this simple teleological argument is enough to proove "God".
If you reduce "God" and the world to one entity (as many religions do) things are getting a bit more complicated and your question can be rephrased as: "Existence. - Why and what for?"
I'm sorry to say the following: There is no satisfying reason for existence per se.
Here you go my friend:
http://bfy.tw/BWJv
I hold the answer - God is the one unbegotten. God was never "created" because God has always existed. That which is infinite has no beginning or end, for it always has been. Our Father, and Heaven, are not subject to "time" time does not apply to that which is infinite or immortal. So when you die, you enter a realm where you do not age, where "time" does not apply. That is the truth. Our God is not the God of the dead but of the living and those that believe in me will never die.
God is outside space and time?
He's the Mysterious being
The one who was, and is to come
He is the one created by no one.........
You are trying to say he is uncaused. Is there really an uncaused cause?
Your question can be reduced to: Is there a god?
In western philosophy "God" and his/her/it's creation are separated entities. (Causeless) existence is one of "Gods" properties (as it is a necessary property of perfection, which is by definition THE property of what we call "God"). For many western philosophers this simple teleological argument is enough to proove "God".
If you reduce "God" and the world to one entity (as many religions do) things are getting a bit more complicated and your question can be rephrased as: "Existence. - Why and what for?"
I'm sorry to say the following: There is no satisfying reason for existence per se.
No enough evidence for God's existence?
Not enough to prove him/her/it as an "unmoved mover". :) - That said: I don't want to hinder anyone in his or her believe.
Go ahead, hinder please it's part of it.
Nay. Arguing is bless, hindrance is sin. ;)