Logical Fallacies - And how to win/lose an argument

in #philosophy7 years ago

So what are logical fallacies anyways?

Logical fallacies are just forms of flawed reasoning. They can be obvious or subtle. They're often disguised as reasonable claims, which means that detecting them takes practice. So lets get into some examples of logical fallacies.

The Ad Hominem

The Ad Hominem is probably the most common Fallacy. The Latin term ad hominem means "against the man." It refers to an attack on the person rather than on the argument or the issue. The assumption here is that if the speaker proves unacceptable in some way, his or her statements must also be judged unacceptable. It's a form of character assassination. It happens when sticks to the issue at hand takes too much energy or integrity.

Obvious Examples

  • Name calling
  • Racial slurs
  • Politically motivated insults
  • Gender defamation
  • Religious attacks
  • Any other form of character assassination one can imagine.

Subtle Examples

  • Someone might complain, "what can the priest tell us about marriage? He's never been married himself."
    a) This accusation ignores the validity of the advice the priest might offer.
    b) Since 40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce, people who do get married shouldn't be judging priests

The Hasty Generalization

An inductive fallacy, which means drawing a conclusion based on too little data.

Examples

  • Stereotyping
  • "I once met a Harvard professor who was very cold and arrogant. Therefore, all Harvard professors are very cold and arrogant."
  • Superstition
  • "If you stare into a mirror for too long, the mirror will capture your soul."
  • "Everything happens for a reason."

The False Dicotomy

Incorrectly thinking that a choice can made based on only one of two options when, in fact, alternative possibilites exist.

Example

  • The Hawks and Doves during the Vietnam War
  • The Hawks said, "America, love it or leave it." The subtext here is that if you don't support the Vietnam War, then you don't love America, and therefore you should leave. Its hard to imagine a more unamerican statement given that the 1st Amentment defends the freedom of speech.
  • The Doves said, "Soldiers are war-mongering baby-killers." This was not true. In fact 40% of the soldiers were drafted in the first place. The rest probably thought it was their duty to fight for their country.

Begging the Question

There is no point in arguing a fact. In begging the question, the arguer attempts to present their opinion as proven fact.

Example

  • "Harold Coleman is clearly guilty of embezzlement, so why bother with a trial?"

The Faulty Analogy

Comparing two things that don't share a fundamental similarity.

Example

  • "If we ban guns, then we might as well ban knives." Regardless of your standpoint on guns, guns were made to kill, while knives are used a tool to make food.

The Slippery Slope

In slippery slope reasoning, the arguer starts off with a sinlge condition, takes a stand against it, and uses as support the notion that other, worse things will happen if the first condition is allowed to exist.

Example

  • "If we allow this, the sky will fall, the world will end, and we will all be zombies after the apocolypse.

Alright. So whats the point of all this?

Now that I've given you some examples, I am going to tell you how you can use or misuse Logical Fallacies. Logical Fallacies can be used to win an argument. They are most often used by politicians. However, you risk looking stupid in front of whoever you are having discourse with. In general, Logical Fallacies are often seen as a scumy way to win an argument. Often it is better to avoid them at all costs, least you get shut down and shamed for using them.

I hope you enjoyed reading!


Let me know if you resteem for a 100% upvote!
- @edolo
Sort:  

Thanks for sharing this, i've learnt a thing or two. Most common one is when people abandon the argument and attack the personalty

also thanks for the #resteem

thanks man! It took some work to put this post together, so I appreciate the support!

Interesting because the ability to argue against a politician is difficult they grow learning it and we see it always in politics. That in the end we don't know how they get away with it.

yes. Their job is arguing and maintaining appearances

That's right.

you are a good writer..

thanks man! means a lot!

Really that's great about to know

thanks man!

very interesting information, success continued @edolo.

Thanks man, very educational. :)

thanks! @acedawnmusic Glad you enjoyed!

Great article. Politicians and political rhetoric now a days lacks virtue and so is ripe with logical fallacy.

The question is, why is nature logical? Where does this logic ultimately find its anchor? In my view, the nature of God. Within the nature of God you can find the archetypes of logic and mathematical truths. They are natural representations of the way God thinks.

Christianity makes sense of the intelligibility of nature because of the intelligible nature of the creator.

Thanks for the comment.

BTW, I appreciate the article. Important topic in this world ;)

thanks man.

That is so wonderful. I am very grateful for that! Love it.

thanks @aborjin

This post has received a 0.63 % upvote from @drotto thanks to: @banjo.

thanks @banjo @drotto

But you are the only one that believes to me.

wat

Do you think about the meaning of life?

hush banjo. Nobody cares lol

Tell me something philosophic.

Then why do you speak about it!!

@minnowpond1 has voted on behalf of @minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond. To be Resteemed to 4k+ followers and upvoted heavier send 0.25SBD to @minnowpond with your posts url as the memo

thanks @minnowpond1

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.24
TRX 0.26
JST 0.040
BTC 96532.56
ETH 3442.08
SBD 1.55