The configuration of knowledge as it appears to the human brain is chemical-physical in origin, so it must be assumed that there are near infinite possible thoughts. So our job is not yet done. And thus it is my quest to shed more just than mere light upon these hidden aspects of reality. These heresies of reality must be unveiled, and the quest begins with dialectics and experimentation.

You write things that I can agree with but others that are quite off

there is no chemical interactions between particles WITHOUT electricity. Electricity is thus ALL that is.

Scientists have successfully stored computer files on a strand of DNA... "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." said Arthur C. Clarke once

The problem with your empirical evidence is that you and I obviously do not share the same level of knowledge. I obviously know something you do not or do not want to see. The UNKNOWN rules everything so this means that we can only progress while not being able to prove entirely what we think is the truth. Empirical evidence cannot be, never be set in stone therefore.

But it all starts with the understanding of Natural Laws embedded in the universe, well known by Plato and Pythagoras, and many others. Even Euclid and Max Plank endorsed them. The Laws prove the Universe conscious

"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness... Max Plank