You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: How science has already proven that god does not exist.
You should change the title to: "How the existence of god is irrelevant for science" or something. It would be more apropriate :)
You should change the title to: "How the existence of god is irrelevant for science" or something. It would be more apropriate :)
NOMA (non-overlapping magisteria) is a fallacy. In fact science is concerned to understand all of the natural world, and everything that affects it, even if this interference is supernatural. That is, the science is concerned with the supernatural, provided this is a supernatural interfering in nature or in its understanding.