Being open, an attempt to understanding what humans have between themselves.

darkminded153 (56)in #philosophy • 8 years ago

The basic idea that helps us illuminate our spaces of everyday existences and that which we have between us is relatively simple yet still rarely present amongst humans which should absolutely wonder us. It would be justified to expect that intelligent beings at least realise structural mechanisms of reality necessary for survival. Maybe the idea in the background is that humans do this intuitively and when they accidently stumble upon it, our realisation of that which happens to us constantly. That which is truly important is that we deliberately think and thus move from the back into the front.

So what is this idea and why is it so important to be in front?

It is this: the human is responsible for that with which he contributes to organising the ratio of power that are our social fields women in each other. Within these, we encounter every day and deal with that what we as human beings we have between us. The paradox is that the ratio of power is consolidating supposedly given and that it assures the illusionary uncertainty, while in the mean time a normal human being desired exactly the opposite, he wants certainty. A human is rather open, therefore we can say that normal human beings do not contribute to organizing the ratio of power, lordship and ruling itself.

The idea must be in front so that there will be more normality and less pathology in this world. If there is more normality then there must also be more openness and that represents the core of our (human) existence, for that is ontological.

There is a movie called Bridesmaids (2011) which in a very convincing manner creates fields in which encounter each other and get ready for a weeding. These fields are also the ones which Sigmund Freud had great interest in - what woman have between each other. Those fields bring forth something that rather baffling, their wishes to be able to handle all the inconsistencies and responsibilities that are not a common feature of this or that human, but rather are structural features and what we could call a demand of an existence if self, but that on the other hand in everyday life is not so obvious.

When we understand what this means it also becomes clear something else. There opens another field within which we can think, how can we contribute to consilidation of seemingly given, meaning that slowly we learn about how the "givens" are created by us when we actualy believe that the reality is independet of us.

Simplfied said. That what we have between ourselves are not affected by some sort of heavenly deities or gens, nor the enviromen but rather that what we ourselves create. Therefore we can say that we ourselves create fields which affect how our relationships are to one another, for we are necessarily involved.

Being ready for opening and revelation launches a wave of talking, humans interacting on what has accumulated between woman, thus it can be said that this dinamic happening, clouded by dreams, is embedded into intelegent reflection in which the can deepen and exploere even further. This can be done for women will always have this, even in the future.

People seem to often think how to know what true love is and how to recognise it. But they seem to always come to the same realisation at the end, and that is: "you can't always have everything". One must not attach another person onto him/her self, for love is just that. You must not do that for the openess of that person is a prerequisite of love, otherwise the opposite happens and it can destroy the loved person. (I hope i do not sound to corny, i am just trying to think and understand what the relation between humans is - i sound like a robot XD )

The openness of another human is absolutely an IDEA, at the same time it is opening the openness of the existence itself. We can say that the human can truly insists merely in openness that is the idea of being open within itself, no longer existing as a fiction or illusion. When we talk about being open and openness, there exists merely opening, but not the human. That which is open, is just fiction.

Let us go forth in life unburdened by any prejudice, that is certainly a great thing to remember for everyone who would like to consume in life more than what the capitalistic market can offer us, trapped in the struggle of power and illusion of openness, justice, democracy and freedom.

We humans are remarkably sensitive about certifying and of course equally on rejection, this only shows the reality of just how fragile our identities are, how vulnerable the personal structure is. The capitalism for its working needs just those people, as personalities. It needs only certain personalities which do not retaliate, but if they do, they are only permitted in a certain way, a way that the capitalism can handle. On the other hand, capitalism proves that it works on the basic idea of change, therefore it constantly changes and revolutionises. It creates a global culture in which it manifests itself therefore we can say this now: capitalism is a spirit and is a culture.

Today we no longer talk about mass culture, we rather talk about popular culture. What is in the west popular right now - besides the election? The interaction of man and woman in the social field. Does the west (in general, not the top few) even know what is going on in the middle east or other countries?

Become more open and stay open, you will notice things in a different way, a way in which you cannot be ignored or killed, for you will simply see the truth. Take responsibility for your contributions of power ratio that is in our social field of woman and man within each other.