Sort:  

Some of the people posting about these ideas, like @fatkat, mention him, but most people don't. And no one talks about rectification of past property-based injustices.

I guess my worry is that in thinking through and posting about this approach to society and politics, a lot of people here are trying to reinvent the wheel - as if no one in mainstream political philosophy has ever thought about this stuff before.

Nozick and his Harvard colleague, John Rawls, held opposing but extremely influential views about what counts as a just and fair society; libertarian and minimal state from Nozick, social democracy and income redistribution from Rawls. I think it's hard to really understand what's going on in the modern version of these debates without having some contact with their ideas.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.13
JST 0.028
BTC 59934.86
ETH 2666.82
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.45