You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is "Pro-Life" an Accurate Label?

I hate the term pro-life, it is designed to destroy conversation and make horribly evil of any who oppose it. For, who is not "pro-life" than some sick sycophant.

The correct terms are pro-abortion and anti-abortion.
But the terms have become pro-life vs. anti-life and pro-choice vs no-choice.
So, indeed, there is no communication allowed.

The human life starts about the time your parents are born.
In your journey, you have decided to incarnate as a human with certain life goals, and those choices were made with your parents before they were born, and the threads of life that would become you started at their birth.
Yes, the planning of you, by you, is that complex.

The anti-abortion crowd is really quite stupid. But twelve years of govern-cement school at dizney programming have made them that way. Instead of anti-abortion, the entire group should be anti-feminism and anti-FED.
Feminism and the FED have done more to set up the wholesale slaughter of half of the children in The U.S. Yes, 50%! It is horrifying what they do, but to speak against them is to invite the worst backlash you can imagine.

Sort:  

I would say that the correct terms would be pro-abortion, anti-abortion, and pro choice --> freedom for the autonomous individual --> free will --> reason --> life.

You used words here like "decided" and "choices" in a way that's confusing to me. I don't think humans really have choice from a materilistic determinism perspective, but attributing choice to pre-born is stretch for me.
As for feminism and the FED causing the wholesale slaughter of half the children in the US, can you give me some context to understand what you mean?

The Non-federal No-reserves Non-bank enforces "negative real interest rates". That is, savers are losers. Even if you put your money in a savings account, you are losing buying power; always.
There isn't enough money to pay off all loans, so the slowest runners on the treadmill of life get axed. (we are told its just because that family was bad with money; that's why the went bankrupt) This causes a tightening and tightening of the economy. Right now, most people feel like they can't make it, and so are much more likely to consider abortion.


Feminism is not about "empowering women"... well, actually it is, if you consider the correct definition of empower, that is, that someone outside is giving the woman power. They aren't about making woman powerful as women, they are about setting up women to act like men. So, these "empowered" women are setup for a fall, to never become women, and to be destroyed in life... at the expense of men.

Feminism is anti-family. And, anti-men. So, what happens is that women are set up to disdain men. So, the nice guy doesn't have a chance, they have been placed beneath notice by the constant anti-men brain-washing. Women are still turned on by alpha-males. But, there aren't too many of them, so they turn towards the alpha look-alike, the bad-boy.

In my opinion the number one cause of abortions is women trying to tie down their bad-boy boyfriend. Women have stopped playing by the old set of rules, but demand that men still play by the old set of rules. So, they do the "honey, I'm preggers" routine, hoping (knowing in their mind) that the bad-boy will "man up" and marry the bitch. And when the bad boy decides he won't be tied down and walks, her usual plan is to abort.

If this is not the case, the other alternative reasoning is that women are so stupid, or lazy, that they can't use one of the dozens of forms of birth control available to a woman. (including the morning after pill) And so choose abortion as a means of birth control

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 60220.70
ETH 2591.99
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.55