RE: Tracks of good and evil
I did consider the question yet it is a question from your perspective believing that you know what good a fly can do or what a fly may be capable of doing now or in its future or, evolutionary pathway. You say you understand the fly's role in the greater universe.
The fly's role in the now and here, "believing what I know ". You're hilarious, so no, you didn't consider from your own understanding of how much a fly can teach, heal or help others, you considered it from an utmost and hilariously absurd perspective, thinking that you somehow have considered it at all by doing that.
For you, you believe that the Buddha holds more significance to the universe yet, there is no evidence that can nor ever will be available to prove such a stance. This means that good or bad is always dependent on the viewer as the universe itself only deals in what is possible and does not have a position either way.
Evidence? Gosh, let's see how obtuse and closed minded you really are:
What is the qual for evidence?
And the final nail in the coffin is that my FORMATING is complete and without need of paragraphs, it's one, singular and not overly complicated thought which oddly enough you understood, despite the motions to the contrary.
Perhaps if you were a fly you would think differently.
Such wisdom, such depth of reflection, tell me, as a fly, in your perspective, how much could you help, heal and enlighten others compared to a being which is in a far more superior position to do those things?
And thank you for demonstrating that you've got nothing to say to anything I said really, only to again and again act as if you know what morality is and isn't from the perspective of the universe and father time themselves.