Allison Mack, Keith Raniere, NXIVM is there a connection to Pedogate? Someone disagrees with what is on the docket part 2!

This pertains to a debate over the pending charges on the case docket for Allison Mack. I feel the word "Pending" was the only clarification needed, but was told I may be "aware" of the U.S. code concerning the child sex trafficking charges, but by what the commenter assumed I didn't understand, their decision was I had not "read" the code. I did indeed read the code and wasn't aware there were others in the fight for good who placed themselves in charge of ruling out free thought processes and the right to discuss speculations/allegations. I felt it was attended to in the first response, but the commenter seems to be more interested in being a "right fighter" rather than shining a light on an issue much of the general population either is not aware, or prefers to turn a blind eye to such evil subject matter. Sadly, the victims. . .the children who are indeed being abused by many, including groups of this nature or front, they don't have the luxury of pretending it doesn't exist. It is front and center in their face. In many cases multiple times a day. Those who finally are rescued or escape, never escape the psychological effects left in the wake of the severe damage they were forced to endure. I was actually astonished someone would make this a "nit picking war," rather than looking at the big picture involving a subject matter that receives little to no attention from the mockingbird media. Isn't it supposed to be our job to grab any avenue we can to remind people this evil exists?

If you would like to see part one with the initial comment it can be found here
https://steemit.com/pedogate/@artistiquejewels/allison-mack-s-pending-charges-and-the-disagreement-over-them-is-this-part-of-pedogate-are-we-allowed-to-talk-about-it

Commenters 2nd response
the 2nd under 1594 C and 3551 states this Conspiracy to commit Sex Trafficking OF Children by Force, Fraud or Coercion.

You can't go by the phrasing of the charges on the docket. The court must defer to the actual law which defines the crime and gives authority for its prosecution.

What I'm saying here is that it does not matter how the charges are phrased on the docket. The docket is not an indictment, and its wording does not have to be precise.

You may be aware of the codes, but it appears that you did not actually read them.

18 USC § 1594(c) says, "Whoever conspires with another to violate section 1591 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both."

There is nothing about child sex trafficking in that code. It is for conspiracy to violate § 1591 which states, "Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion".

So, since the 2nd charge is conspiracy to violate § 1591, it should read, "Conspiracy to commit Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion" [Emphasis added].

The docket is in error. And, so the court must defer to the law itself and it will understand that the charge is actually "Conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of children" or "Conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion".

So....

I'm just glad to see the general public won't be able to continue denying the Child Sex Trafficking anymore.

The Child Sex Trafficking which you mention, may not exist.

My comment to this response.

You may feel that you’re the one to tell those submitting the case docket that they are in error, but I know they are well within their rights to submit that as a pending charge. For one Keith Raniere has a son. He also has a hoard of schools called Rainbow Cultural Garden and they are all over the world. One was shut down in Miami and the one in the UK had one of the Bronfman sisters listed as CEO. Do you think an alleged pedophile, or alleged human trafficker should be running those schools and developing curriculum? Other children were subjected to that cult and witnessed abuse. So not sure why you would want to take issue with the NYPD when they have wanted to bring this corruption to the forefront in the past. I know they don’t have a problem calling a spade a spade as the FBI already jumped in and took justice away from them in the Weiner laptop evidence.

Now it is possible they will try to pull the same gig. But right now people’s attention is also being drawn to the possibility of the child sex trafficking. That is a good thing, not a bad one, so not sure why you want to throw your hat in the ring over wording and assuming people don’t understand the word Pending. Thinking people know specific charges may not pan out. People need the ability to see the big picture not just zero in on something that isn’t even an issue. The bigger picture is pedogate. Whether these people end up being charged for it or not, it still is an epidemic. Children are still missing and never returned!

No one is disagreeing here about wording. It could be servitude charges under sex trafficking or could be child sex trafficking. It’s a shame the child sex trafficking and the servitude of women involving Raniere was covered up for years by corrupt authorities. This is why people want attention drawn to it. I believe those on the side of the victims, who’s perpetrators have enjoyed many long years of unobstructed abuse, will use whatever means is out there to Draw Attention to It!

So I could argue your same point from the opposing side. . .Conspiracy to commit Sex Trafficking of children. And for you, the Conspiracy to commit Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion. I believe that is the wording you are wanting rather than what they put down on a docket. I find it interesting the Legal Information Institute and the DOJ word it the same way as the docket. Perhaps someone should have a word with them. This is how they write it, “18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion.” Anyhow, I get your point, but once again “Pending” simply trumps all of it.

You are aware I’m sure just who has been working on this for years now and actually laying the ground work as in this in effect April 28, 2018 http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section1591&num=0&edition=prelim

Yet another area the ground work has been laid whether the general public realizes it or not. Look at how sex workers and whether you or others fully understand, the push against FOSTA and SESTA was an attempt from a sickening agenda going on for years now to lower the age of consent. The way they have operated is if they can’t get their way within the bounds of the law, they will forge their own methods right under people’s noses (precise, calculated cabal tactics). It has been heralded by people like Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The same type of people BTW who gather around Epstein who mixed in those connected with NXIVM. All part of the “lifestyle choice” agenda.

Epstein was convicted on Child Sex Abuse charges. Yes, it was ridiculous how he did hardly any time for the abuse, but big money and connections get you protection for your crime. That is exactly what this case with Raniere and Mack will lead to which provides a perfect cover for the trafficking of children. Interesting how birds of a feather. . .

I’m still not sure why there is a need to be a right fighter when the bigger picture involves child victims. In this fight people need to put pride aside. It’s not about nit picking truth tellers, but rather exposing the vile corruption and at the root of it is absolutely the child sex abuse. You spent all that time pointing something out I and other’s on the side of good are well aware of. They may not be indicted as implied by Pending Charges, so doesn’t really require any further grand standing or definition. I’m sure you’re just trying to help us “read” as you felt I was only “aware” as you pointed out and possibly not engaging on your same level of comprehension.

I would think groups like NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love), Heart Progress and PIE are a testament to the evil agenda being circulated about in an attempt to seed people’s conscience or make it more “normalized.”

I for one want to put a stop to their vile agenda and I would hope others want a light shed on this whether “pending” or not. Let’s awaken people and get them motivated to take action where genuine charges Are Prosecuted to the full extent. If this means military tribunals, so be it!

There is not a law that states we are not allowed to talk about it. You are not going to be able to stop people from drawing attention to the fact this organization or at least the leader with the same charges has been involved in child sex abuse and very likely trafficking. No one is doing what you are assuming and stating they are being charged for certain on child sex trafficking (at least I have not seen that anywhere, have you)? If you have, maybe your beef is valid, but I assure you those I interact with are fully aware of pending and how those pending may or may not be prosecuted. Make no mistake those in authority well know the facts. Will a corrupt agency try to intervene?

Human trafficking encompasses sex trafficking and the Child Trafficking which they decided to place on this and Keith’s docket. The or’s and the of’s may be for right fighters, but not for getting the mass public to start recognizing someone in a position of bringing charges, has named child sex trafficking. The wording is out there (yes, I know they may not be charged). This is no longer only speculation that such evil exists by what MSM and the general public view as “conspiracy theory.” They cannot deny the phrase exists on a docket.

Now will they try to find loopholes as these corruptors' attorneys do. Possibly some will. Will they be indicted on these charges? Maybe, maybe not. And I realize you just want to attend to the law, we all want that. Possibly they will be indicted on the obvious, not as concealed charges of human trafficking which in this case does involve servitude in the form of sex slavery as already told by some of the victims including known crimes as rape. Rape also is not on that docket, yet there it is and in with Mack being a possible accessory. Are people discounting these stories by the victim just because it is not on that docket? No, they are weighing out information and considering the fact that people are preying upon others. Point being, as they continue to uncover their crimes, more evidence will likely be found. People are being forced to take off the blinders to this type of abuse. Then again, the choice to know is there's after all. They can continue to pretend it doesn't exist on the level we know is out there, has been out there for years.

At the end of it, I get your beef, but you are trying to reword what a professional put down on a docket and I find it interesting. If that docket is wrong in how they worded it, or you feel they should clarify better, you should also make the Legal Information Institute aware because this is how they write it, “18 U.S. Code § 1591 - Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion” and the DOJ writes it the same way also. Just thought that was interesting. Godspeed!

Here is one of the reports I did involving NXIVM, Allison Mack and Raniere

Here is another. You are able to find more on my youtube channel.

Thanks for reading everyone! Please let me know your thoughts and opinions in the comments below. God bless!