The idiocy continues; Flat Earth as well

All you did was repeat that "no property rights encourages unethical behavior" failing to see that if no property rights are violated and everyone consents there is no such thing as unethical behavior and there cannot be, after all, without property rights how can there be a victim or victimizer?

So we agree.
So we agree that steem(it) - as a platform - has no ethical code.

Social structures without ethics do not survive.
(they do not function properly as we can see from steemit).

Which is my point.

And I responded to his nonsense "agreement"...

Stermit is not steem you clown.
Also, Steemit has a code of ethics. That's is why they banned the blackmailing hackers about a few months ago.

You don't have any argument. All you have is a nonsensical assertion that "social structures without ethics do not survive" as if you defined what the ethics are. You talked about Universal Ethics, which is non aggression principle. Since nobody can aggress anyone else on steem, there is no possibility that universal ethics can be violated.

Again, what is the ethical issue? Who's property rights are violated or who's consent is violated?

You refuse to answer that question and now you think that claiming that we agree, whilst ignoring the fact that my response was contention after contention to everything you said, and the conclusion clearly argues that on steem, ethical issues cannot exist because nobody can violate anyone else (strictly speaking in the context of Universal Ethics). We don't agree. You Clown.

Posted using Partiko Android