What’s been going through my mind a lot--is whether the release of this weapon was with deliberate intent; and if so, by whom. It wouldn’t make sense for the Chinese to release it in China, not when you consider how much it’s costing them in their workforce and lost revenue. I don’t think the value of human life extends far beyond those considerations as far as it pertains to the government in China, and we might say the same for other governments around the globe.

Trump was talking about fixing AIDS in the 2019 SOTU as well in 2020. Did he know someone was mixing it with a coronavirus? Was he telegraphing a willingness to end AIDS if they used it? Or was he laying a track record of plausible deniability knowing that he may use this weapon against the Chinese at a later date? If that horrifying scenario is the case, does it mean it’s race-specific against Asians?

If it’s not race-specific against Asians, it’s plausible that it will be just as lethal in other countries as it is in Asia. This means, if the case fatality rate of those infected is 20%, then one in five infected will die worldwide. Unless some populations got inoculated with an AIDS cure via the food supply (or chemtrails) to cause some kind of localized herd immunity.

Is it just an accident? If so, what are the chances it’s race-specific, and why would China experiment with a weapon that only affects the Chinese? I wonder how serious the two countries are taking this trade war, and whether this bio-weapon release shows an escalation beyond the economic.

Would Trump use this weapon as a trade war retaliation and or payback for fentanyl? It seems like a terrible question to even contemplate, but someone has to consider the possibility. Just the fact that he was talking about ending aids a year before an HIV enhanced bioweapon plagues humanity is unusual. Or perhaps that talk startled the creator of the weapon to the point where they decided to release it before it became obsolete.

Setec Astronomy