You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Did minds.com fail?

in #palnet5 years ago

I recently looked at it and it looked to have quite a few improvements since I last saw it. But I don't know since I haven't fully explored that platform. Ignoring what has taken a presence there, do you see it as something you would use if others went to it? I know there's the thing about gas but just focusing on the website itself. And eventually of eth is successful at solving its scaling issues that could all get resolved.

Sort:  

I don't really think I could use it... I'm not convinced on tokenomics that are very rigid.

  • Our token only does this

Greed is an ugly word, so we've invented more palatable concepts to embrace it's necessity, and ambition is part of the gamification of an economic system. If there's no real reason to stack up MIND tokens, and no exchange, the only way the go up is if minds.com becomes the new facebook. What is the likelihood of that?

and I only say this because if the amount of eyes on minds.com is in the billions, then it would make sense for people to pay more for the visibility. But the problem is circular. It's not no visibility, so the token is cheap, the token is cheap because it has no visibility.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.14
JST 0.029
BTC 59214.68
ETH 2622.69
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.44