You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: State of OCD

in #ocd7 years ago

It doesn't matter if it's good content or not, you are unfairly profiting more by using them than everyone else that doesn't

Shit @acidyo. Look if you're stubborn and hard headed mate.

How many times do I have to tell you that in the entire three years that I have been here on the platform, I have only used bidbots barely a handful of times? All those times just as simple experiments to test them all to write a post about them and using absolutely low ridiculous bids and rickety funds just like this last 'experiment' I did recently.

Me profiting more than everyone else? Who the hell are those who you so insistently refer as everyone else? Those who are so poor that can't even afford send the minimum bid of 0.10 steem to any of them?

and at the same time letting their business continue instead of forcing them to curate and make the EIP a success.

Hahaha, I wish I had that power. If it had been for my use and purchase of their services, they had long since died of the most devastating starvation. :D

If you can't understand that yet at this point I don't know how much more I can help you with.

@acidyo, just make memory and tell me with total sincerity.

How many times along these three years and exactly when was the last time that you personally, @ocd, @ocdb, @ocd-resteem or anyone else on your team of curators for that matter has upvoted and/or 'curated' one of my posts or comments despite having used your official tag or have I shared my articles on your promotional channels in Discord hundreds of times?

I've already said that if I had to count with the fingers of just one hand the times I used bidbots, I would have fingers left over. But I'm afraid that if you now had to answer my question, you would have all your fingers left over. isn't it?

Sort:  

So that's what this is about? Lack of curation? Why did you reply to something pretty unrelated then?

Okay I get it, you used bid bots only a few times and it just so happened to be used recently when most of them are getting downvoted.

Now suddenly it's about lack of curation. I'd love wasting more time into this rabbit hole mate but it seems it never ends with you.

So that's what this is about? Lack of curation?

Well yeah, you could say Lack of positive curation for one part. But mostly by your suddenly and recent negative curation on my post as my main gripe.

Why did you reply to something pretty unrelated then?

What in my reply/replies results to you so unrelated to the main subject of your post or about what @deniskj said before in this thread in which we are now interacting? Are not all my replies & comments more than relevant in our entire discussion?

Okay I get it, you used bid bots only a few times and it just so happened to be used recently when most of them are getting downvoted.

Yep! that's right. And mine jointly with most of them that are getting now downvoted, was downvoted without any reason beyond it has been voted by a Bidvote and blindly downvoted by you without having been READ the post before. Verifying first if its content was actually 'low effort, poor quality, plain greed or a piece of shit' which wouldn't deserve barely pass the barrier of the minimum 20 STEEM threshold of the new rewards curve boundary. Can you objectively refute my claim?

Now suddenly it's about lack of curation.

No it is not. It is clearly about the opposite. It is about your active willingness to spread blind NEGATIVE 'curation' that you and only you intimately consider a 'just' cause without more reasons than yours. As a lonesome SJW. Was that clear enough to you?

I'd love wasting more time into this rabbit hole mate but it seems it never ends with you.

As long as you stay unwilling and disinclined to address directly & frontally the central core of my questions and claims... yeah, you can say that going through my rabbit hole will never ends with me. :)

Yep! that's right. And mine jointly with most of them that are getting now downvoted, was downvoted without any reason beyond it has been voted by a Bidvote and blindly downvoted by you without having been READ the post before.

Yo, I'm close to muting you. This is my last reply.

If you use a bid bot to get a profitable vote, and the bid bot owner profits off of it and the delegator profits off of it, who the fuck do you think is losing in this scenario? Are you actually that blind that you can't get it behind your thick skull that you are taking rewards by all other authors and curators because the blockchain only prints a certain amount of Steem daily. The profit you are earning whether it's on a shit post or a post where you cure cancer is coming from something that anyone can do but shouldn't cause it undermines the EIP and just feeds more Steem to greedy bid bot owners who do nothing all day but make sure their bot is running and delegators who are either afk or want to make more ROI than the rest of investors no matter the cost.

Please tell me you understand by now why it doesn't fucking matter what the bid bot vote was cast on. I would have downvoted it had it been Trump posting on his verified intro post. If you wanna take it personally than please go ahead and fuck yourself.

Loading...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.32
JST 0.078
BTC 62668.59
ETH 1695.46
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.40