RE: State of OCD
Wow, virtually the most dumb comment I have seen. Everbody else seems to not use their downvoting power because they don't want to be downvoted.
We are downvoting posts that buy bids for their low effort content and farm rewards, which is something that helps everyone, you included on this chain. Our downvoting is not our main focus, curation is and has always been, even @ocdb is only a sideproject of @ocd.
There is zero guarantee you get curated by a whale even if you write the worlds best content, but wait till you use a bid bot. They will definitely find you then.
Yes cause finding these posts that lack curation takes time cause there are so many of them, hence we reward the curators for doing so. Finding bids cast on content is pretty easy, you just gotta follow the bid bots and see what they're voting on and if it had a bid sent to them previously.
I'm amazed at your comment, seriously. Good job.
Obviously nobody is going to downvote at the risk of retaliation especially if they cannot afford. Clearly you can because you are always asking people to downvote your content. Clearly it costs you nothing because you don't have to bid to be upvoted by your equally high stake friends.
Now that people have started attacking the OCD posts and taking rewards away from your delegators it is now a threat because you risk losing those individuals. At least you can use the OCD stake to refund those downvotes. Where is the acceptance of being downvoted that you have been preaching. Preaching water and drinking wine are we?
It is probably a good thing if you do lose those delegations because now we will have more people actively curating and hence more content will be discovered.
Ah!! Condescending as usual. Hope that serves you well on your high horse.
I don't care if people downvote my posts, but they are now downvoting posts of innocent curators because their shitty ROI is at stake. We at ocd have always helped counter unfair downvotes from other projects and this is obvious retaliation because we are downvoting their vote selling. Are you understanding that part? They are still selling votes to garbage content only being purchased because they are profitable. No one is buying votes for promotion. Everyone on Steem is losing rewards because these shits keep selling votes to feed their delegators because they got used to earn 100-200 steem daily by doing nothing but making sure their bot is running. Now they are getting downvoted and take it personally and start retaliating, too bad they are only making themselves look worse, which was hard to accomplish in the first place.
Anyway, have a good day.
Uhm, wadda hell! Then I wonder what exactly could have been considered "over-rewarded", "farm rewards" or "low effort content" in one of my lastest post recently downvoted by @ocdb. Which by the way, has been the only significant downvote that I've received in all my content in more than three years that I've been 'wandering' over here writing good stuff.
¡Holy crap! despite the fact that just recently I could've bought a vote through a bidbot on that post as an experiment. ¿Do you guys even READ thoroughly those posts you are gonna downvote just to be sure if these are really 'low effort' or actually shit posts at all?
Thru the same three years I've been here, With just one hand I could count the times I bought a couple of humble bids. And I would still have fingers left to count them all.
Shit!! Is it that we can no longer perform our mischievous & daredevil 'experiments' when the time seems to be the right one?
Stop buying profitable votes from bid bots, you are directly taking money from everyone that isn't.
Are you by chance implying that you and your 'Cureitors' are downvoting posts arbitrarily and indiscriminately by solely the fact that their creators are buying votes from bid bots only?
And that to carry out this presumed 'sanitation campaign' by you and your 'Team' none of you have READ previously a single shit of what the author has written before cast a downvote?
Could you swear that you or your Team Of Curators have actually read from top to bottom the content before downvoting it as to be able to determine with total and overwhelming certainty that their posts are mere low effort shit posts and absolute garbage content which don't deserve be 'profitable' after their investment and before your willi-nilly downvote?
By chance, do you even cared to READ carefully and thoroughly my previous comment?
Yeah! the length and 'eloquent' response to it clearly indicates that you have not done so. };)
Yo, I'm the only one doing the downvoting. I am downvoting anything that has a profitable bid bot vote on. I do read some of them but my downvote is meant to make it unprofitable for both buyer and the bid bot + delegators.
How about you stop having a tantrum and enjoy the curation they'd give you if you wouldn't use them to unfairly get more rewards than everyone else by using their services along with 90% of shit content that still keeps doing it.
I read a lot of things here, like your post when you were asking for help that I sent you Steem for which you didn't even bother to say thanks to.
I bet you are not the only one.
Evidently!!
It's obvious you can't READ all of them. And as for the second part, again, it's evident. And certainly I wouldn't have major issues with that if the targets of your downvotes were not so 'blindly' indiscriminate.
You are well aware I am not a chap of tantrums. I just say what must be said directly addressed to whom it is incumbent without much fuss. Regardless their corpulence, muscle bulkiness, voting size & height or of the fatness of their wallets.
Ha, unfairly get more rewards than everyone else? When the hell did that happen? Didn't you read before when I said that if I counted with one hand the times I bought a vote through Bidbots I would spare most of my fingers to count them all?
And yeah, for my part you can feel free to downvote that 90% of shit content that still keeps doing it. As long you make sure those posts are actually shit content as you so carelessly affirm it.
If you weren't so reluctant to comment for once in one of my posts. And I wasn't so reluctant to send wallet memos with comments and let alone waste my time in Discord. You would have known since long time ago, how grateful I was to have been the object of that rare gesture of solidarity, goodness and generosity you had with me at that time.
So, in deferred, thank you very much for your great help!. :)
It doesn't matter if it's good content or not, you are unfairly profiting more by using them than everyone else that doesn't and at the same time letting their business continue instead of forcing them to curate and make the EIP a success. If you can't understand that yet at this point I don't know how much more I can help you with.