You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Distinct Gender Roles As A Recipe For A Successful Society?
The current societies are very matriarchal unlike the past societies, the welfare state is a way of overprotecting the citizens as a mother to her child, being in both cases harmful.
That is why today we are so terrified of war, obviously war is the last option, but it is an option, especially when a very big threat arises.
We can see the contrast between Prussia, the militarist state by default of the middle ages, and the current Germany, which provides subsidies to immigrants.
In my opinion, all these egalitarian currents are a form of socialism and are anti-natural, because it starts from a false premise that we are all equal.
Yes, I agree there is some form of socialism involved. And the bigger the state gets, the less women are dependent on men, and the less power men get. Viscous circle indeed.
Of course, the state generates a hierarchy pattern that repeats itself to the smallest scales, if we place a member of a minority in the highest position of power, then that minority will grow abruptly and take much more force in society, also taking a leadership role in society.
Exactly. That is the biggest danger, and could very well be the driving force behind the SJWs and mocking of the traditional high status white man. We could very well end up with a situation similar to that described in 1984, where no moral or intellectual standard are required as long as you are for the regime (the Party).
Yes, but just as today this can be a serious danger, tomorrow can be a great advantage, because it means that a single man placed in the right position can make a big change.
You can see how in America, since the arrival to power of Trump, border immigration has been reduced, even a couple of months ago when he still had not taken action, that's because his presence in the White House brings a series of impacts on society.
When Obama was the president, it happened almost exactly the same but in the opposite direction. I do not want to imagine what would happen with Hillary in power.
Clever contrarian thinking:)
Ding! Ding! Ding!
We've got a winner!
what???
You have correctly pointed out correctly that socialism tries to ignore what is natural and human nature. It is why socialism always fails.
Oh, and that people wrongly believe men and women are the same. You can only do that by suppressing the innate desires that make women vote for welfare and men like competition. When you do that, you end up with wussified men and unsatisfied women.