The story
In the Middle Ages, the Crusader and the Kharjis used to kidnap small children from the robbery in Muslim cavalcade. Later, they used to use them against Muslims. In this, their children were safe. The battle was caused by Muslims in Muslim.
The Muslims who fought against the Muslims on behalf of non-Muslims and Kharjis did not know that they were Muslims too. By practicing addicts and royalty, they gradually erased their own thinking power and erased them.
Such kidnappings are not currently, but the Muslims have an adverse view of the hostility and false accusations, but do not stop in the Muslims. The Muslims of the subcontinent are ahead of all by blaming each other. Among them the Bengalis will occupy the first place. Why is this happening?
We are actually victims of cultural aggression, mis-education system and media terrorism. Since childhood, we have grown up with memorization, false media reports and false history. We also get used to the temptation of living in luxury of employment, in these memoirs. Like our addict, our own thinking energy disappears and forgets the past history.
The British have prepared our education system in such a way that we become skeptical. Forgetting the identity of the other Muslim brothers, they have an adverse impression and sit down by attacking each other without checking the good and evil, truth and falsehood. Saudi Arabia and its religious scholars were the victims of the biggest hatred of Bengali Muslims from British rule.
Islam's favorite tawhidi to Saudi is the main reason for the hatred of the Muslims of Bengal, because it is "monarchy" In the monarchy usually a king recruits the heirs before his death. If we look at history, after the Khalafa Rashidin, almost all the Umayyads, Abbasid, Fatimi, Ottoman Khilafat, Seljuk, Ayyubiye, and Mamluk Sultanate have ascended the throne.
Those who give fatwa as "forbidden monarchy" will say, if the appointment of succession to the throne is forbidden, then how can the Khilafat and the appointment of succession to Sultanate become lawful? And if the Khilafat, Sultanat, the monarchy is forbidden to appoint succession, then on what basis have the Muslim rule system survived for so many years?
One of the main reasons for the racism of Bengali Muslims in Saudi Arabia is that Saudi Arabia's founder Muhammad bin Saud founded the Saudi Arabia by destroying the Ottoman Khilafat. But what does history say?
Nur Uddin Jangi (Rh) was the Seljuk Sultan Seljuk Sultanate fell into the hands of his disciples and friends Sultan Ayoubi (Rh). Ayyubi Sultanate fell in the hands of another hero Mamluk Sultan Rokon Uddin Bibers (Rh).
When the throne became shaky due to the weak position of the inefficient ruler, the small kingdoms of the state declared themselves independent, or else the other occupied it. The Ottoman Khilafat was also in possession of the inefficient rulers.
Many warped Muhammad Bin Saud and the battle of the Khilafah as a religious war. The history of Muslims in Muslim history is not new. Salahuddin Ayyubi had to fight with his cousin. King Humayun fought with Sher Shah. Emperor Alamgir had to fight against his own brothers.
What is more important than the throne that has sat on the throne? Before looking at what Muhammad bin Saud did, we see what happened in the center of the Khilafah in Tursaq?
Mustafa Kemal Pasha throws the last nail on the coffin of the decaying khilafat. He came and closed the mosque, madrasa. The Qur'an forbids reading, Azan, beard, hat, hijaab. There is no humble act to eliminate Islam which he did not do. But history itself has introduced us to Kamal Ataturk or the father of Turkey.
When the rulers of the caliphate could not control the Khilafat system in their own country, how did Jazirat al-Arab control about 2500 kilometers away?
Muhammad Bin Saud did not come to power in Saudi Arabia, if the British came and started the prejudice of Shirk-Bidat in the name of religion; Or would the secular power like Kamal Pasha grab power, would that be good for us?
Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani said, "The western pigs can be white, the pigs can be black, but all pigs are prohibited. Without the exploitation, the ruler has no caste and no religion." It is futile to hope for righteousness to the ruler. History has been observed, most of the rulers have not been able to pay a lot of religion, they have lived luxurious lives.
The question is whether the ruler is obstructing the people in performing religious activities? Are they unable to meet the basic needs of the people? Do not break the peace chain in the state? What is the trial of the criminal?
The Saudi royal family is not our ideology, nor its rulers, our foreign policy is to India and America. The education system is secular and communist. What is the loss of Bangladesh due to Saudi Arabia?
Since all the criticism of our money, we will criticize. But after getting the criticism from the Raj family, from the grand mufti to the Baitullah, all the mosques of Nawabid mosque have been abducted by many people by calling for help of the dalabari alim and many people went to Jihad ground to free Mecca-Madina from the Dajjal.
As I said earlier, you have no objection to the ruling that the government has abused you all day long. When the objection comes, when many people are known or unknown, they go beyond the limits.