Global temperatures COOLER now
than when Gore won Nobel Prize in 2007
................................................................................................................................................................................
---from the article---
- Meteorologist Joe Bastardi explains: “Al Gore was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize based on warnings of future events — the same future events that have not happened. The fact is that global temperatures from 2006-2007 while Gore was basking in the glory of his apocalypse-driven fame were warmer than they are now, and we are still falling off the Super El Niño peak. Additionally, much of the time in-between was lower than what it was in the run-up to ‘An Inconvenient Truth.'”
Bastardi added: “Fact: Without monkeying around and ‘finding’ warming, temps have changed very little during 20 year AGW hysteria period.”
I'm always fascinated by this global warming shit. "Superstorm" Sandy (it was not a "superstorm," just a damn hurricane hitting low-lying coastal cities) seemed to be public validation that the world is turning to shit.
Interesting to see the "hottest temperature ever in 2016" is within 0.01 degree margin of error.
what IS the margin of error? how wide?
can YOU read .01 degrees on a mercury thermometer?
How long have electronic thermometers been in existence?
good sign
I dont think the problem can be seen looking at the max. temperature alone. There are places where historical maximum and historical minimum have happened within last month and less than 700km apart. So the system is becoming more and more unstable, that is basically the problem.
actually it's not becoming unstable...the historical cyclonic index is at a historical low. The number of violent storms and weather is also at a historic low. For example..it's been many years since a strong hurricane has hit the north american continent.
I can see in the graph that if we were in 1994 you may have said hurricanes are disappearing, and then the following year ZAS, record hurricane knots. But if we take the last 40 years we can see an obvious uptrend in the speed of hurricanes. You remember bitcoin price from almost $1000 to $170? following the same logic, you may have said bitcoin was done, and then ZAS $4000. What I mean is: if you look at the bigger picture, or even in the whole graph you uploaded (not just the last few years), you may admit that we may discover the biggest hurricane in history just next year, in the north american continent as you noted.
Also, you related violent storms with unstable weather, and again I want to note that looking at the peak of number of violent storms is not the way to see instability, but the distance/number between the minimum and the maximum of the number of violent storms in this case, in a given time.
As the ending point, and always with maximum respect (not to see any instability in my reasoning ;) it would seem that you appear to believe that extremely detailed data reflects the trend of the system, and that is rarely the case.
pd: dont believe everything you see in the news: data may be real, but the interpretation of it, that is where evil resides.
pd2: I may be wrong, if I am, I will happily admit it, having learned something new.
comparing bitcoin to ACE is a strawman if I've ever see it.
they have exactly nothing to do with each other.
I've posted the graphs of the raw data.
You can do as you please.