You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: In Loving Memory Loss - Trump & A Dead Soldier.
I don't trust this story one bit. First we know democrat politicians are lairs and would make up anything to trash the president like the Russia collusion story. Second, we don't know the context of the whole conversion. He could of said a thousand wonderful things about this man and the family just picked up on one kind negative thing depending on the context. I mean every solider knows they might be killed in the line of duty before they sign up. So technically Trump is spot but again we need context of what he was saying if he really said it judge this story.
Well we do have proof he is a liar, don't we? I mean he must have known he couldn't fulfill a lot of his campaign promises, so we are sure he knowingly lied then. So why would anyone believe he isn't lying again?
And we know he hates losing which is why we have among other things his certainty that 3 million illegals voted which is why he didn't win the popular vote and more people at his inauguration than at Obama's. This last one is the most troubling, because he is disregarding facts, pictures of both events, and he is getting upset over something that is no big deal, of course Obama would get more people, Washington D.C. is Democratic, Hillary got 90% of the vote there, so that means 270,000 Washington D.C. residents didn't go to Trumps inauguration (that doesn't include the children of these people) so the people who did go to his inauguration most probably had to come from far away. Why would a person not see this very visible explanation for the lower attendance at Trump's inauguration, especially him?
The talk by Trump's biographer makes painfully clear that Trump literally lives in a bogus reality mainly constructed out of convenient denial.
I did my best to make clear what is publicly known here and it does no good to avoid what is publicly known. Ultimately, there is no recording of the call publicly available, so we only have the words of the witnesses to go on. The witnesses, in this case, are the family of the dead man and someone who has been elected to 'govern' - vs. Trump. What motive does the grieving family have to condemn Trump - are you suggesting that they are just angry at having lost their son and so turned on Trump unfairly?
I find it odd that the congresswoman just happen to be there while Trump made his phone call. Who know what she said to this family while they waited. Maybe bribed them to say what they said. Who knows but why should we believe anyone that is being backed by the corrupt democratic party? The whole thing wreaks like a distraction to the Las Vegas investigation or anything else that we have physical evidence too.
Trump claimed to have evidence - he has provided none as far as I am aware. When he actually does provide none, will you still think he is being set up?
Yes because both sides have provided zero evidence but like I said before this is a distraction from real news with real evidence.
So if Trump makes false claims, you will still conclude that he is right and the Mother of a dead soldier is lying - even though you have no evidence that she is lying?
Trump says one thing the Mother and this Congresswoman say a different thing. Who should we believe?
We have new video of another widow having a wonderful conversation with the president. What does that mean? Off day for the president to call someone and be nice to them?
The most suspicious thing about this whole situation is this congresswoman at the house at the time of the presidents phone call. Do we know how long she was at the house waiting for the president to call or was it just coincidence? She needs to be looked at more closely if you want to know the truth. That's just my opinion.
Question everything, for sure.
Yes sir.