You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: EPIC: Google's Leaked Document On Their Censorship Of The Web: 'The Good Censor' - What I Learned About Their Logic & How Steem Can Leverage Their Failures. (Part 1)
Thanks for reading!
The topic of judgement is a huge one and I am very tired here now, so can't reply in full. As far as I am concerned judgements always involve a denial of some kind. This needs to be felt to be understood. Judgements have us thinking that x is y, in a rigid and limiting way that does not allow for change and deeper insights.
'Dogs are scary' is a judgement - when the truth was really that 'I was once bitten by a dog and feel fear that has not yet been accepted and processed'.
If the truth was that then it's more accurate to say that "dogs are scary" is a prejudice, not a judgement. Judging is discerning, there's no reason to say that discernment always involves some kind of denial or that they have us thinking apples are oranges. Prejudices and bias on the other hand may very well describe what you said.
Posted using Partiko Android
For me, judgement is not discernment. Discernment leaves space open for change - whereas judgements are outside of time and continue to have a lasting effect in self long after they are formed. Discernment notices the differences in things, whereas judgement has a blanket quality that denies details in favor of quick (and typically false) conclusions.
I've just pointed out that prejudice and bias is more accurate for the example you gave, do you not agree? Now the question is why do you see a difference between discernment and judgement? It's as if you have a prejudice against the word itself, because discernment and judgement are interchangeable and describe the very same act.
Posted using Partiko Android