EU COURT: VACCINES can be held RESPONSIBLE FOR CAUSING SERIOUS ILLNESS even when full proof is not available.
There continues to be a great deal of controversy and uneducated error involved in discussion about vaccinations. This topic remains the only one that I have received direct death threats for speaking about and they came from a pro-vaccine troll who tried to claim that by me sharing scientific data about the failures of vaccine science, I was putting the lives of children at risk and so should be killed! - Logic was obviously not his strong point.
Historically, the courts of the world have generally give a mixed response towards cases of vaccine injury (where vaccines are thought to have caused serious illness in the recipient - or even death. Billions of dollars have already been paid out in compensation for families of children who have died after receiving vaccines. Far from the 'wonder medical treatment' that some claim vaccines to be, they are - in truth - potentially lethal and have also been proven to actually CAUSE EPIDEMICS of the diseases they are claimed to help protect us from. This phenomena, known as 'shedding' occurs due to the vaccine containing the virus that it is intended to protect us from, thus spreading the disease in an unpredictable way that sometimes gets spread on to others.
Recent EU court ruling on vaccines is promising for victims of vaccine injury
RT recently reported that an EU court ruling made clear that vaccines can be identified as responsible for causing serious illness and death, based on the court's appraisal of the evidence presented regarding the case and the vaccine involved. As I understand what was said, this means that there is no need for extensive and expensive exploration of each specific case of vaccine injury in order to 'prove' that vaccines were indeed involved in causing the illness. This is potentially a good thing, since anything that makes it easier for victims and their families to get compensated is a step towards breaking the unhealthy system of control that currently exists where people are literally being forced to be vaccinated in various ways and find they have no way of remedying the problems caused in the courts later on. America still insists that their 'vaccine courts' only identify that liability for illness falls on the part of the pharmaceutical industry where symptoms are identified and reported in a very short window following the vaccination; which, given the nature of the symptoms involved and the lack of understanding parents and doctors often have about the risks of vaccines - is unacceptable.
RT writes:
"The European Court of Justice ruled on Wednesday that a vaccine can be considered defective - and thus the cause of a disease - if there is "specific and consistent evidence" related to when the vaccine was administered, the patient's previous state of health, the lack of family history of the disease, and a significant number of reported cases of the disease occurring following vaccination.
The court went on to state that such factors could lead a court to determine that "the administering of the vaccine is the most plausible explanation" for the disease, and that "the vaccine therefore does not offer the safety that one is entitled to expect," AP reported."
Source: https://www.rt.com/news/393492-eu-court-vaccinations-ruling/
Some important points about vaccines that need to be made here
The RT piece above stated that in a recent measles outbreak: "89% of those with measles were un-vaccinated" and the undercurrent inference is that this is due to people's rejection of vaccines and thus the movement to stop using vaccines is dangerous and responsible for illness breakouts. HOWEVER, there is MUCH more to the situation than is spelled out in the RT piece.
For a start, 11% WERE vaccinated and had measles anyway - so why risk damaging a child's health with vaccines when they don't seem so effective anyway?
Secondly, natural immunity is far superior to the alternate form of resistance that vaccines can cause (vaccine induced resistance expires and requires more vaccines to be administered) and requires us to have full exposure to the disease and then results in us being immune for life. So having a disease is not necessarily evidence of a risk to health in the wider sense - it could be said that it is evidence of the immune system of individuals learning how to defend the body from further attack. This is why parents have 'measles parties' where they deliberately expose children to other children who have measles in order to spread the disease and create real immunity.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly - there is a strong chance of vaccines 'shedding' - where those who are vaccinated actually start the local breakout - leading to ridiculous cycle of attempting to vaccinate people to solve a problem partially caused by the vaccines! An awesome business model though, for psychopathic-ally greedy 'business owners'.
The reality of shedding is often denied by pro-vaccine supporters - however, this document from the American FDA makes clear that vaccine shedding is a real phenomena.
Further viewing on the flawed science used to promote vaccines
Myths, Beliefs and Facts about vaccines - Dr. John Bergman:
Dr. Nancy Banks exposes the vaccine industry:
Dr. Tim O'Shea on Vaccines:
FOR MANY MORE VIDEOS PLEASE VISIT THE VACCINE KATALIST AT UREKA: https://www.ureka.org/katalists/view/8756/vaccines-related-criminal-activity
You really made me consider my point of view regarding vaccines. They are not all good, and not all necessary, and people must inform themselves before letting their kid get vaccinated. The attached videos (given the arguments from those doctors) really made me clear that pharmaceutical companies have a lot of power... Thanks for writing this man, keep it up! I love your research!
you are welcome - i have studied this topic for a long time and appear now to, frankly, seen more than many doctors who I have listened to who speak on the subject. by 'more', i am referring to the ability we have through diligent internet research to see a wide variety of evidence and studies that the average practising doctor just doesn't have time or the inclination to pay attention to.
i am thankful there are so many medical professionals who have seen the broader picture of vaccines - the next step now is to enhance humanity's immunity without vaccines :)
And that is what I love about reading in general, gaining knowledge in a short time where other people have spend hours of research in. And I'm very grateful you write about various subjects that mostly interest me as well!
But indeed, the knowledge from medical professionals must be spread to enhance humanity's immunity with the right vaccines. On the news and on the webs I actually only see those demonstrating people who don't really know what they are talking about, or can't give in-depth arguments. Articles like this, which include your sources (thankgod, I really like sources for professionals), improve true knowledge.
You motivate me to start writing my own articles/blogs about scientific subjects man, thank you so much. After my exams I'm planning to re-write and share some of my research (including scientific sources) to help spread knowledge like this!
i am glad you find the information useful - if i had one message to pass on it would be that the body is very intelligent and we degrade it with thinking that says that the body is at it's natural potential and we need to use drugs to improve it. in reality, most humans are far from their potential and it is the thought process that most needs to be freed to evolve now.
I agree and disagree. You're basically refering to Darwin's evolution theory. Our physical state will adapt indeed, to a certain level. We consume (food) non-nature chemicals which our body can't handle well (evolution takes time), therefore we do need external help (medication) to help in this matter. On the other side, we indeed have come to a level that we can increase our mental state (thinking) because we basically live in the environment to do so.
I got the shot for yellow fever to go to Brazil. I am an adult. I take it as a calculated risk.
Ya know what I found out also? Here in the US, we have a secret Vaccine court that is closed to the public where victims & families have been suing big pharma & winning! You need to check out the documentary Vaxxed.
Yes, the law was changed decades ago to make vaccines exempt from the usual liability and court process. the vaccine manufacturers claimed that they could not do business unless they had some special protection. it was at that time that the number of shots given to small children started to go through the roof.
there is a wealth of information on the relevant issues in the katalist at ureka, here: https://www.ureka.org/katalists/view/8756/vaccines-related-criminal-activity
I would like to clarify something about shedding. By shedding we refer to the vaccines spreading the diseases they are supposed to protect from. Is that possible and how likely are they to do that?
The most important thing to remember is that getting sick or not getting sick depends on the outcome of a competition: The competition between how strong the germ is, and how strong your immune system is.
Unless you have an immunodeficiency problem, your immune system is quite strong! However, if it comes into contact with a large group of strong germs, it can lose the battle. Sometimes, what gets you sick is not the germs themselves but the toxins they release. In these cases, vaccines don't have whole germs inside them. They only have inactivated toxins. In some cases, vaccines only have parts of a germ in them, not the whole germ. In other cases, vaccines have whole germs in them, but they are so few and have been weakened so much, that the immune system will surely win!
Shedding is when a germ that is infecting someone is found in one of their body fluids, and can be transmitted to another person. Not all germs are shed, being shed does not mean being transmitted, and being transmitted does not mean being strong enough to get someone sick.
How strong is your immune system before and after the vaccine?
Before the vaccine, your immune system doesn't know what the germs look like. It's strong enough to fight deactivated toxins or half germs from the vaccine, but not strong enough to fight the real germ of the outside world. The half or weakened germs can be found in your body, and perhaps they can even be transmitted into another persons body by you! But that doesn't mean you or the other person will get sick. They are too weak or inactive for that. They're just... there. Their "picture" is there. A vaccine is like a message. It says to the immune system "look at the picture of this germ: this is bad for you. If you ever see it in real life, fight it!"
Statistics show that vaccines save wayyy more lives than taking. There will always be cases where something goes wrong. It's like selling... shoes, or food. There will always be a couple of defectives. Same happens in operations and any other medical intervention. If you get appendicitis, you have to operate. Can it go wrong? Well, theoretically it can, but it will save your life most of the time.
In issues like health, people tend to get scared and give more credit to the very rare cases that something goes wrong (ie. ten people died because of X treatment), than to the actual statistics (i.e ten people out of two billions died because of X treatment) and don't usually pay attention to the details (i.e ten people who also suffered from a bunch of other health problems died while using X treatment).
greetings! thanks for responding here. i am wondering if you looked at the link I shared about shedding from the FDA, it's been a while since I read through it, but it is there because it describes actual shedding from vaccines as I recall. Shedding is not a possibility, rather it is a known outcome of the use of some vaccines in some cases.
Vaccines are much more than just a 'picture' - they also include numerous toxic adjuvants which appear to be a big part of the problem with them - including aluminium and formaldehyde - neither of which have a place in a healthy body.
With regards the idea that vaccines save more lives than they erase - that is quite a claim, but does it really take in all the variables? Are you 100% certain that there isn't something being missed on those calculations?
I suggest listening to how Wim Hof forced the textbooks to be rewritten after demonstrating that he can consciously modulate his immune response to make it many times more effective at removing invading bugs:
Thanks for this information - we must do more to have a choice instead of being forced by laws to subject our children to risk. Where there is risk we have a choice, and it is one we shall make without a threat from a higher authority, that is just a slave to the pharma industry.
you are welcome! indeed, yes - it helps to re-member that we are our own authority - An 'author' is just the one who writes the story.