From an article today she also implicated Bill Richardson...in an article I read a few weeks ago Richardson went to Epstein ranch in NM, after that visit he supposedly told an aid to return all of Epstein's campaign contributions, he didn't elaborate past saying he didn't like what he observed at the ranch. This is something that can be proven as campaign contributions are traceable, that would mean this women could just be pulling names out of a hat just because she may have saw them on one of his properties.
Dershowitz sued her lawyers a few years back for defamation after they filed against him on behalf of her, seems he could prove where he was on the day(s) she alleged he raped her. After he provided the evidence her lawyers dropped the case against him and he dropped his case against them. Supposedly the new evidence she is going to bring forth against him is housekeepers who say they saw him enter Epstein's New York mansion which supposedly he denied ever being there. The claim is they saw him enter and go upstairs and that young girls were there at the same time as he was...but that doesn't prove he raped anybody nor are there any allegations by the housekeepers they saw him rape anybody. My personal opinion or take on this allegation is she is mad he got Epstein a light sentence the first time around and it's taken her years to get another go around. When she filed suit the first time she perjured herself, that's not going to look good going forward. He dared her to keep making her allegations so he could counter sue her as he has stated he can prove everywhere he was during those allegations so she supposedly took him up on his offer. Now I am expecting him to counter sue.
My other personal assessment is after having watched him numerous times on television is that he is not a rapist. I worked in manufacturing for twenty years and I've developed this saying and I am pretty close to what studies have shown to be true....that's eighty percent of all men will cheat, ten percent will cheat with the right person and ten percent will not cheat at all, Dershowitz, in my opinion falls within the latter, I read him as a man who has been honorable to his wife.
I hate to use the words gold digger, but if you're right it would certainly fit. There's certainly enough money flowing around any allegations she could make stick to incite such behaviour. I don't have any faith in lawyers, from experience that has led me to believe the best lawyers are the worst people, but that's my bias, not the facts of the case.
Thanks!
I don't know if gold diggers really fit as much as maybe looking for compensation of a stolen youth. I guess they could argue a case for naivete...but there also comes a time of taking personal responsibility for the course of action(s) one takes/taken in their lives. If you continue to let people take advantage of you who's fault is that really?...not that they shouldn't be compensated for being taken advantage of being so young and naive but at what point do you also put some blame upon yourself for not walking away, picking up a phone, a lot of these girls went on to recruit other girls...will they be held accountable for that? Then there is the question where were these girls parents? Did they file missing persons reports or were they complicit in their kids hanging out with the rich and famous. The whole thing is horrid for sure, should have never been allowed to happen in the first place, especially for as long as it went on...that length of time could have only have happened as long as everyone was complicit with each other and no one took any personal responsibility to stop it.
One of my oldest sisters daughters is writing a book about her mother who was killed out in California at the hands of those who perpetrated California's worse mass murder. In the book she is going to portray my sister as a victim of circumstances, which is true, she was, she was abused by her dad, her mom's boyfriend and his friends...when we were all taken away from my mother and placed in foster care she chose to run, she kept running away from anywhere they put her. They put her in places where she had the best psychological help available but every time they released her back into foster care or a group home she'd just run. When she was reaching of age where they could no longer keep her a ward as a last ditch effort they decided to release her to an independent living residence in another city hoping giving her a chance to start anew in another city would be what it would take to get her to change around...but she didn't. These are personal choices, you can't help people who don't want any help. From the age of eleven to the age of nineteen she refused to listen to anyone nor wanted any of their help. As an adult she chose to live with a pip, she choose to be a prostitute for him, she choose to have kids by him, she choose to abuse her own children even despite numerous attempts by her own family to rescue her from him by letting her come stay with them, every time she choose to go back. Her daughter went up for adoption as a baby, she dodged a bullet for sure compared to her half brother and sisters, but trying to explain to her because someone was a victim once does not mean you remain a victim your entire life, she absolutely refuses to see it that way and is intent on publishing this victim hood book on her mother who basically chose to go to be a horrible person. She thinks it's just horrible of me to talk about my sister that way...I told her the public records are out there, go get them, it's the truth, her writing one letter under duress before she was murdered doesn't excuse the truth. When the book is published and if it doesn't hold the truth I'll be writing the reviews.