Based on your comment, I don't think you read my article in its entirety; just reacting to Griffin's disgusting photo. There's a lot of rich layers I bring up -- much more useful, in my opinion, than the low-hanging fruit of Griffin-bashing.
If you did read my article in its entirety, then I would argue that what Griffin did is NOT freedom of speech. In her comments pre-controversy, she admitted that was going after Trump and his youngest son, Barron. That's a psychological assault, and I do hope that Griffin is held to account for that.
Based on your comment, I don't think you read my article in its entirety; just reacting to Griffin's disgusting photo. There's a lot of rich layers I bring up -- much more useful, in my opinion, than the low-hanging fruit of Griffin-bashing.
If you did read my article in its entirety, then I would argue that what Griffin did is NOT freedom of speech. In her comments pre-controversy, she admitted that was going after Trump and his youngest son, Barron. That's a psychological assault, and I do hope that Griffin is held to account for that.