UK government report already states that the COVID19 test cannot detect an infectious virus. The Test is fraud.

shadlife (56)in #news • 3 years ago

Here in the UK we try to determine if someone is infected with COVID19 or not based on the RT-PCR test used in the UK. However, it is very clear in the government report that the test cannot detect an infectious virus. So why do we still use this for measuring infectious rate? (Page 6 in the report in the link that is given in the source)

There is a BBC clip of an expert (Dr Allyson Pollock) stating the same thing in BBC news. Look at the short BBC news clip by clicking on the second link in the source further below. The scientist says "...it is not a test that tells you whether you have an infection or you are infectious..." and goes on to state that "... evidence of old infection, and that especially in children can result in them being isolated unnecessarily and harmfully"

Furthermore, she also said, "we don't know whether they work or what these tell us community settings", "we have not established whether the screening intervention works and what the harm and the benefits are".

There are plenty of other issues with this. Below is a video where even Dr Anthony Fauci states that over the 35 cycle threshold, is useless and will give false positives. Below is the video for it.

There are other videos of doctors stating that anything above 40 or even 35 cycle threshold is going to give too many false positives. Below is a link for the videos from twitter. Yet why is it that the NHS is using a 45 cycle threshold? Why is this going on? Why would someone think a 45 cycle threshold is a good idea? Is it because they want to blow up case numbers through false positives?

https://twitter.com/lyne_ian/status/1326069162058285056?s=08