The Truth About Xenophobia

in #news7 years ago

While on location in Quebec City

to cover the recent shooting at an Islamic mosque

Dan Dicks of Press For Truth

provides his thoughts on the controversial topic of xenophobia.

Support us on Patreon ➜ http://www.patreon.com/PressForTruth

Sort:  

I agree, an open, rational discussion is needed, rather than emotionally charged rhetoric. I believe the chaos occurring now is engineered and proceeding according to plan, unfortunately.

The mentally ill always avoid the big elephant in the room radical Zionism and do there best to focus only on Islam. Add the fact so called Christian Nations have continued to invade and murder (by the masses) in many predominantly Muslim Nations shows how pathetic they are! War propaganda is not complicated, well I guess it is for some.

I am getting the picture now that pressfortruth is no different than "Rebel" Media (but not as bad 2 b fair)

FYI Dan Muslims have lived in the West for a long time with no real issues. Sorry I know you don't like people breaking your rhetoric

I would say , he is right, and the facts aren't being addressed , I have no problem with Muslims, most people don't , the problem is when people are given a shot of hope and then find nothing to back up the claims, currently many are fleeing the war zones in proxy wars , only to go where the problems have arisen from and find nothing there. I agree the wars have to stop, but as long as there are political ties to economy and humans have their heads up their asses , nothing is going to change.

Ive followed pressfortruth for a while. He agrees with everything you're saying. Dan understands that many of these muslim fanatics have been created by the West through the endless wars, bombings, and CIA funded mosques. However, they are here now, and trying to get people to understand that there is a real threat, isn't necessarily a bad thing. However, it's important to realize that radical islam is being used right now as a hammer against the west. People just need to realize who's swinging it; and its not the Muslims. Hard for many people to grasp that concept; so for the brain washed masses it might be easier to show that there really is a problem with the radicalized muslims that are being brought to our door step.

@riva-16 Fair enough except his title is "Truth About Xenophobia" while only spreading "xenophobia" and funny how he ignores real truths like Bissonnette is as stated by multiple former classmates very "pro-Israel, pro-Trump, anti-immigration". Fyi you don't get described as "pro-Israel" multiple times, unless you were a person that consistently defended their policies. On his Facebook page among his likes were also "Trump, IDF and United with Israel" pages.

Radical Zionism extremist does exist and many like Dan choose to ignore it. Even when Muslims get shot down by a known Zionist they focus on Islam. (that doesn't seem odd to you)

Point is, there was not much truth in his report at all. Are you familiar with Baruch Goldstein? Because I doubt Dan is, because it doesn't fit his rhetoric

I am not familiar with who that is. But your points are well taking. Radical Zionism is a very dangerous thing as well. It's good to point these matters out, and not be shy about them. I just wish more people would realize how radicalized people from all ideologies are used as tools to push forward agendas. Whether they are set up by an intelligence agency, or acting on their own accord TPTSB never waste a good crisis. I find Dans reporting to be overall fair and decent. However, I do agree with your points, this defientaly wasn't one of his best reports.

I think the key is open dialogue without condemning people for what they think. I respect Dan for bringing that up. But you make good points. News can either be dry facts, which is not entertaining, or storytelling. It's difficult to communicate issues to people who are unaware, in a way that gets their attention and brings clarity. I don't think it's easy to not have any rhetoric.

I wish your account was getting a lot of bot upvotes compared to the other crap out there that is getting paid out for no views and complete crap.
wish my upvote was worth more.

The problem is that Dan does not engage on the Steemit community. The accounts that engage will always win out over time. Some of the accounts that get all the votes were early adopters when the content was not as good and people never turned off the bots.

dan is pro censorship as he has flagged me for pointing it out from his old posts where he says he wants everyone to think the same way he does so he can do anything he wants.
@dantheman

None of it matters if the whales want to silence you because they have the power. they don't want to lose their power so they will never fix the problem. the bots are just more proof that it does not matter how many upvotes, view, or anything else because a copy pasta post with a link at the bottom will get bot upvotes and a decent payout.

say anything about it and get flagged to death like I am dealing with.
speak up about getting flagged by whales and they say its a threat and flag you more.

This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Feb 03. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $4.08 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Feb 03 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64222.08
ETH 3135.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.99