You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Crash course in journalism, lesson 8: Research part 2
@bahh , can tell this mother who just burried her daughter, what happened to her if the terror attack was fake?
Now go back to your troll cave and leave us alone.
Shouldn't you establish some credibility before opening your mouth? As if you can lie repeatedly and then distract everyone with "maybe you should say something to some victim" bullshit.
You want me to beg you to stop lying? You want to stop insinuating the bullshit that "it's real because the news says so", especially when the story of "israel is the victim" isn't believable anymore.
The real question is, why argue that EVEN IF IT'S FAKE, IT'S REAL.
Is it fake? Is it real?
Why is there a crane even though the video has no crane? Is there a surveillance camera even though we can see both "videos", or the video being filmed on the computer screen, moving and swaying, not very surveillance camera like? Where is the blood? All that damage and dust and no blood on a white cab, not one visible drip or splat? Who shot the cab, where are the muzzle flashes? Why was the truck blurred?
What can I tell that "mother" that "burried her daughter"? Do I know that woman? Are you that insensitive?
You try to argue yet again that even if it's fake it's real, are you aware you did that?
Why try to act as if there is a crane, why try to act like you didn't lie repeatedly about seeing a crane?
Why change your story a million times, why accept the narrative without question? Why dismiss important questions and discredit the article by lying about the crane and what is seen repeatedly, when everyone can see the same thing? Do you not have any integrity?