hmm

The constitution of Bangladesh says that everyone is equal in terms of law. The nation will provide equal opportunities for everyone regardless of religion, caste, gender, etc. It is again said that the High Court is an explanation of the constitution and the custodian / custodian. But the court or the court rejected the order to reform the Kaita system. Saying it or the jurisdiction of the state The present quota system, which is totally contradictory to the statement of the Constitution, despite the fact that it was known to the court, the writ was dismissed directly and the Court rejected the idea that the Constitution protector? Then the government ignored the discriminatory behavior of citizens? It is clear that on the basis of state excellence, I have been giving various facilities to citizens of different types of fences. Whereas the equality mentioned in the constitution, When the state is violating the law of giving equal facilities, the High Court is giving some kind of approval to the anti-liberation activities of the government. So what is the point of the high court that refers to the relics of ordinary people?