Top 3 Facts That Destroy The CIA Russian Hacking Story

in news •  last year

There is an abundance of fake news out there, and today we are going to come back to reality, and we are going to take a look at the declassified CIA report that allegedly proved the Russians hacked the 2016 U.S. Election.    

Here are the top 3 facts that debunk the CIA's "Russian Hacking" story:    

1. The latest report still does not provide concrete evidence – The mainstream media is now scrambling to change its talking point from “Russian Hacking” to “Russian Influence,” because the latest report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence still lacks the proof needed to back-up the claim that the Russian government directed the hacking of DNC servers.     

Nevertheless, a story on the report from Gizmodo said, “This report contains some of the most damning and explicit language about Russia’s involvement in the election that we’ve seen so far from US intelligence officials.”  

Interestingly enough, when a mainstream media figure did attempt to point out the obvious lack of evidence, he was ridiculed as a result. CNN Host Michael Smerconish was ridiculed by his followers after he posted a Tweet that said, “Where’s the beef? Someone pls direct me to the evident? I want to see more. Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking.”    

2. The DNI report debunks itself with curious disclaimer –  The report includes a disclaimer, which says, “Some of our judgments about Kremlin preferences and intent are drawn from the behavior of Kremlin-loyal political figures, state media, and pro-Kremlin social media actors, all of who the Kremlin either directly uses to convey messages or who are answerable to the Kremlin.”   

As WikiLeaks noted, the report “has the curious disclaimer that it is based on watching TV shows and reading Tweets.”    

While the mainstream media has claimed that “it looks like Russia hired internet trolls to pose as pro-Trump Americans,” it seems to have forgotten the fact that they are accusing Russia of doing exactly what Hillary Clinton did when they hired a paid army of online trolls. They are essentially saying the Russian are guilt of manipulating the election—just like Clinton!   

3. The report used a show that ended two years ago, in order to prove “Russian influence” on the 2016 election – The report identified RT’s “Breaking The Set,” a show hosted by Abby Martin that aired from September 2012 to February 2015, as one of the main influences that pushed Americans to vote for Donald Trump.    

Once again, the allegations that have been made against RT could have also been made against Clinton. She was known to have “kept journalists in her pocket,” which included a Politico reporter sending his stories to the Clinton campaign for approval before sending  them to his own editors, and a CNN analyst leaking debate questions to the Clinton campaign.    

Even with the obvious lack of evidence, the media propaganda machine is still running full-speed with this “Russian hacking” story. What do you think? Let us know in the comments!    

If you want stay up to date with WeAreChange, and you want to learn more about how you can truly become the change you want to see in the world, check out or website and sign up for our newsletter!     

You can also access exclusive content from We Are Change by contributing monthly to our Patreon.     

Check us out on social media:   





SNAPCHAT: LukeWeAreChange   

We take BITCOIN too: 12HdLgeeuA87t2JU8m4tbRo247Yj5u2TVP            

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

smerconish Michael Smerconish tweeted @ 06 Jan 2017 - 23:17 UTC

Where's the beef? Someone pls direct me to the evidence? I want to see more. Intelligence Report on Russian Hacking

wikileaks WikiLeaks tweeted @ 06 Jan 2017 - 22:38 UTC

US government's declassified "Russian hacking" report has the curious disclaimer that it is based on watching TV an……

Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.

All intelligence agencies, world-wide, routinely use "hackers" from outside of their organizations to achieve various goals. Mostly this is done indirectly, as in the case of purchasing zero-day exploits, being hired by a third party individual or front-company, or they are infiltrated and manipulated into executing particular deeds. However, sometimes the objectives of 'some' hacker groups are in-fact aligned with those of the state .. I believe this was the case here, although there is still no reason to believe that the hackers were 'knowingly' employed by the FSB.

I just laugh at the stupidity of people running around screaming the Russians hacked the election and made Trump win.

I think it would be more plausible if they said the boogey man did this...