From Twitter Rules: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311
Harassment: You may not incite or engage in the targeted abuse or harassment of others. Some of the factors that we may consider when evaluating abusive behavior include:
if a primary purpose of the reported account is to harass or send abusive messages to others;
if the reported behavior is one-sided or includes threats;
if the reported account is inciting others to harass another account; and
if the reported account is sending harassing messages to an account from multiple accounts.
Hateful conduct: You may not promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease. We also do not allow accounts whose primary purpose is inciting harm towards others on the basis of these categories.
Really? Why don't you ask Twitter. But maybe disparaging Lemon's sexuality with a little derogatory name calling helped. Twitter did him a favor with the temp ban. He needed to cool off before he embarrassed himself, his friends and his family even more. Real men don't act that way, ever.
So you can't point to any tweet. You can't screenshot and post a tweet that violate their terms of services and then you insult Trump and Stone. No wonder no one takes libtards like you seriously. You make claims that you can't even prove.
Where do we begin. Second tweet is does not violate the terms of service, he's just insulting lemonade which I don't believe is a violation given the guidelines you posted above. The theme with these two tweets are clear that he thinks Don Lemonhead lies a lot. So for the first tweet we can eliminate the hateful content from the list of potentially violated terms of service. Working our way up the list, there's no evidence that he harassed lemonhead from multiple accounts. There are clearly no threats and the account is not meant to send abusive messages to others. The only potential violation is inciting others to harass an account. In my opinion I don't think the first tweet violates that term of service because from the context, it seems like he's calling for people to call BS they feel when lemonade spews BS. That is considered confrontation, a news anchor being proven to report deceptive news would be humiliating since the job description of a news anchor includes honesty. And news anchors that lie would be punished because they won't appear to be as credible so a smaller spot light is put on their content. #ByeFelicia
Now that I assume your premise of they are a private corporation and they can do what ever they want is correct, which to be fair I agree with.
Why does twitter never suspend the accounts of people that call for the death of donald trump?
if a christian bakery wrote in their terms of services that they will not bake wedding cakes for gay couples, would that be acceptable? After all, they are local business, and they clearly wrote it in their terms of service.
From Twitter Rules: https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311
Harassment: You may not incite or engage in the targeted abuse or harassment of others. Some of the factors that we may consider when evaluating abusive behavior include:
if a primary purpose of the reported account is to harass or send abusive messages to others;
if the reported behavior is one-sided or includes threats;
if the reported account is inciting others to harass another account; and
if the reported account is sending harassing messages to an account from multiple accounts.
Hateful conduct: You may not promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease. We also do not allow accounts whose primary purpose is inciting harm towards others on the basis of these categories.
So tell me, which one of these guidelines did he violate and which tweet caused the violation?
Really? Why don't you ask Twitter. But maybe disparaging Lemon's sexuality with a little derogatory name calling helped. Twitter did him a favor with the temp ban. He needed to cool off before he embarrassed himself, his friends and his family even more. Real men don't act that way, ever.
So you can't point to any tweet. You can't screenshot and post a tweet that violate their terms of services and then you insult Trump and Stone. No wonder no one takes libtards like you seriously. You make claims that you can't even prove.
Libtard?? LOLOLOL.
Buhbye Boris.
Where do we begin. Second tweet is does not violate the terms of service, he's just insulting lemonade which I don't believe is a violation given the guidelines you posted above. The theme with these two tweets are clear that he thinks Don Lemonhead lies a lot. So for the first tweet we can eliminate the hateful content from the list of potentially violated terms of service. Working our way up the list, there's no evidence that he harassed lemonhead from multiple accounts. There are clearly no threats and the account is not meant to send abusive messages to others. The only potential violation is inciting others to harass an account. In my opinion I don't think the first tweet violates that term of service because from the context, it seems like he's calling for people to call BS they feel when lemonade spews BS. That is considered confrontation, a news anchor being proven to report deceptive news would be humiliating since the job description of a news anchor includes honesty. And news anchors that lie would be punished because they won't appear to be as credible so a smaller spot light is put on their content. #ByeFelicia
Now that I assume your premise of they are a private corporation and they can do what ever they want is correct, which to be fair I agree with.
Keep trying Boris.